지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.2
- 수록면
- 99 - 108 (10page)
- DOI
- 10.15187/adr.2016.02.29.1.99
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background : Cooperating with other designers is an essential aspect of every design project. This article empirically demonstrates that mixing up designers with different social traits would be better in co-design practices than forming a design team composed of members with similar traits. Here, one way to categorize designers’ social traits was by their tendency of having “social influence” as the classification of having either a dominant or submissive trait.
Methods : Six co-design groups were formed: two Group Mix-up D-S – one dominant type designer and one submissive type designer; two Group D-D – two dominant type designers; and two Group S-S – two submissive type designers. They were asked to develop a fictitious vacuum cleaner and think aloud in their co-design practice. Their verbal protocols were then analyzed to see how they behaved towards each other in their co-design decision-making.
Result : We found that mixing up the heterogeneous social traits in a team was better for triggering a heavy “test-retest” discussion (Group D-S), and teaming up designers with the same tendencies show either a quick affirmation (Group D-D) or a tendency for last-minute decisionmaking (Group S-S). Marrying different social styles is beneficial for leveraging a high level of design decision-making.
Conclusions : Our findings suggest that mixing up different social traits in co-design practices may induce design decision-making for robust and coherent solutions. Though a scaled-up study is further needed, diverse social styles in a co-design group could trigger the members to seek different design solution spaces and be less primed to a first ideation sketch.
Methods : Six co-design groups were formed: two Group Mix-up D-S – one dominant type designer and one submissive type designer; two Group D-D – two dominant type designers; and two Group S-S – two submissive type designers. They were asked to develop a fictitious vacuum cleaner and think aloud in their co-design practice. Their verbal protocols were then analyzed to see how they behaved towards each other in their co-design decision-making.
Result : We found that mixing up the heterogeneous social traits in a team was better for triggering a heavy “test-retest” discussion (Group D-S), and teaming up designers with the same tendencies show either a quick affirmation (Group D-D) or a tendency for last-minute decisionmaking (Group S-S). Marrying different social styles is beneficial for leveraging a high level of design decision-making.
Conclusions : Our findings suggest that mixing up different social traits in co-design practices may induce design decision-making for robust and coherent solutions. Though a scaled-up study is further needed, diverse social styles in a co-design group could trigger the members to seek different design solution spaces and be less primed to a first ideation sketch.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Social Influence and Design Decision-making
3. Methods
4. Results & Discussion
5. Conclusions & Future Work
References
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] - Aronson, E / 2005 / Social Psychology / Prentice Hall PTR
[단행본] - Asch, S. E / 1953 / Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments / Harper and Row
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bargh, J. A / 1989 / Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition / Unintended thought 3 : 51 ~ 69
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bearden, W. O / 1989 / Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence / Journal of consumer research : 473 ~ 481
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Berch, D / 2011 / Working memory limitation in mathematics learning : Their development, assessment, and remediation / Perspectives 37 (2) : 21 ~ 26
[단행본] - Asch, S. E / 1953 / Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments / Harper and Row
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bargh, J. A / 1989 / Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition / Unintended thought 3 : 51 ~ 69
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bearden, W. O / 1989 / Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence / Journal of consumer research : 473 ~ 481
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Berch, D / 2011 / Working memory limitation in mathematics learning : Their development, assessment, and remediation / Perspectives 37 (2) : 21 ~ 26
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Design Concept Flow of A Space Designer
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2023 .02
-
Comparative Analysis of Novice and Expert Visual Communication Designers' Thinking Processes
한국디자인포럼
2015 .01
-
AI 및 일반 디자인 프로세스의 디자인 생성 평가 비교 연구
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2023 .05
-
PRODUCT SERVICE SYSTEMS: THE FUTURE FOR DESIGNERS? : THE CHANGING ROLE OF THE INDUSTRIAL DESIGNER
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .10
-
디자인문화 확산을 위한 Social Design System 구축
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .10
-
국내 패션 디자이너 브랜드 개성 구성요인에 관한 질적 연구
한국의류산업학회지
2020 .01
-
Thoughts on the Future of Design
Archives of Design Research
2018 .05
-
신진 디자이너 브랜드의 시장 지향성 고찰
한국의류학회지
2015 .01
-
의미생산자로서 디자이너 저술활동에 관한 연구
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .10
-
디자인 초기 단계의 디자인 아이디어 발산 전략 식별
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2023 .02
-
사용자의 행위 체계에 영향을 미치는 디자인심리 원리와 디자인 방법론에 관한 연구
한국공간디자인학회 논문집
2021 .01
-
Study on the Analysis regarding the Connection Network of Design Inspirations pursued by Modern Fashion Designers - Focus on the Concept of Fashion Collections -
한국의류산업학회지
2015 .01
-
Foundational Study on Ontology Based on Bayesian Network for Design Intent & Elements using Simple Invitation Card Design
한국디자인포럼
2021 .01
-
A Study on the Collaboration with Generative AI for Non-designers in the double-diamond Design Process
한국디자인리서치학회
2024 .03
-
The Value of Design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .05
-
Design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .11
-
HOW TO DESIGN
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .06
-
why new design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2019 .05
-
DESIGN THINKING
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .05
-
My Design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2019 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
벤처캐피탈에 대한 정부출자금의 초기단계기업 투자에 대한 영향 : 한국의 벤처캐피탈에 관한 실증연구
이종훈
,
정태현
벤처창업연구
2016
.04
공공데이터 개방 정책이 공공 혁신에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
임준원
,
최경현
대한산업공학회지
2017
.02
서비스디자인 방법론을 활용한 청년 1인가구의 라이프 케어(Life Care)서비스 제안 : 지자체, 청년1인가구의 코 크리에이션(Co-Creation)을 중심으로
정소형
,
구유리
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2019
.11
미국의 디자인 전문석사학위 제도와 커리큘럼 분석 연구
심은주
Archives of Design Research
2018
.08
역설계 중심의 제품 디자인 교육 과정의 제안
최웅
Archives of Design Research
2018
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-658-002393467