지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.5
- 수록면
- 47 - 63 (17page)
- DOI
- 10.15187/adr.2016.05.29.2.47
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background Although the importance of dealing with paradoxes in frame creation in abductive reasoning has been discussed in design research (Dorst, 2011, 2015b), a logical approach to deal with paradoxes in problem solving has been lacking. We raise the following questions: If design reasoning is not random, what is a logical method that could be useful for designers to engage with paradoxes in the problem-solving process? What is a logical principle behind the interplay among complex meanings?
Methods We attempt to respond to these questions by proposing “the semiotic square” as a logical method to cope with paradoxes in frame creation in abductive reasoning (Greimas, 1987; Greimas & Rastier, 1968). It is assumed that since meaning is grasped in the relations of difference (Floch, 2001; Greimas, 1983; Greimas & Rastier, 1968), the semiotic square involving contrary, contradictory, and implicative relations may be useful to deal with complex meanings in design reasoning for problem-solving. We present the analysis of a design case based on the semiotic square with a diagram. We attempt to describe a logical principle behind the interplay among complex meanings in frame creation in abductive reasoning by use of the semiotic square.
Results The analysis of a design case shows that it is in the logical relations of contradiction, contrariety, and implication that working principles, paradoxes, themes, assumptions behind concrete practices from the problematic situation, and proposals for design solutions may be arranged and better grasped. We found that using the semiotic square in frame creation in abductive reasoning may facilitate the logical development of reasoning about the potential possibilities of design directions because a given meaning may be expanded upon the semiotic square.
Conclusions Using the semiotic square in problem-solving does not produce the solution directly, but it might help materialize the abstract process of frame creation in abductive reasoning. By following a logical path of the semiotic square while questioning the logic behind “WHAT + HOW = VALUE” (Dorst, 2011) and abductive reasoning that infers possible preconditions (WHAT + HOW) for the consequence (VALUE), one might find a simpler and easier way to deal with complex meanings from the problematic situation than managing the process without it.
Methods We attempt to respond to these questions by proposing “the semiotic square” as a logical method to cope with paradoxes in frame creation in abductive reasoning (Greimas, 1987; Greimas & Rastier, 1968). It is assumed that since meaning is grasped in the relations of difference (Floch, 2001; Greimas, 1983; Greimas & Rastier, 1968), the semiotic square involving contrary, contradictory, and implicative relations may be useful to deal with complex meanings in design reasoning for problem-solving. We present the analysis of a design case based on the semiotic square with a diagram. We attempt to describe a logical principle behind the interplay among complex meanings in frame creation in abductive reasoning by use of the semiotic square.
Results The analysis of a design case shows that it is in the logical relations of contradiction, contrariety, and implication that working principles, paradoxes, themes, assumptions behind concrete practices from the problematic situation, and proposals for design solutions may be arranged and better grasped. We found that using the semiotic square in frame creation in abductive reasoning may facilitate the logical development of reasoning about the potential possibilities of design directions because a given meaning may be expanded upon the semiotic square.
Conclusions Using the semiotic square in problem-solving does not produce the solution directly, but it might help materialize the abstract process of frame creation in abductive reasoning. By following a logical path of the semiotic square while questioning the logic behind “WHAT + HOW = VALUE” (Dorst, 2011) and abductive reasoning that infers possible preconditions (WHAT + HOW) for the consequence (VALUE), one might find a simpler and easier way to deal with complex meanings from the problematic situation than managing the process without it.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Frame creation in abductive reasoning
3. Paradox as an object of design reasoning
4. The semiotic square
5. The semiotic square as a logical method for design reasoning
6. Method
7. Analysis of a design case based on the semiotic square
8. Visual anatomy of frame creation in abductive reasoning by way of the semiotic square
9. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
Cian, L. (2012). A comparative analysis of print advertising applying the two main plastic semiotics
schools: Barthes' and Greimas'. Semiotica, 2012 (190), 57-79.
Craib, D., & Imbesi, L. (2014). Enhancing visual meaning: Measuring visual communication design
effectiveness. In DRS 2014 proceedings. Umeå.
Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work . Oxford: Berg
Publishers.
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of 'design thinking' and its application. Design Studies, 32 (6), 521-
523.
Craib, D., & Imbesi, L. (2014). Enhancing visual meaning: Measuring visual communication design
effectiveness. In DRS 2014 proceedings. Umeå.
Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work . Oxford: Berg
Publishers.
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of 'design thinking' and its application. Design Studies, 32 (6), 521-
523.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Square1-E-002
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2023 .12
-
Four Squares
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2020 .07
-
Square 1
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .08
-
그레마스 기호학으로 본 영화 〈기생충〉의 내러티브 연구
애니메이션연구
2021 .03
-
Semiotics based research on the user interface and experience improvement of the elderly people
한국기초조형학회 학술발표논문집
2019 .11
-
Logical Elements
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .05
-
Communication Square
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .08
-
Reflected Square Area
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2022 .11
-
Cross the Square One
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2019 .11
-
Layer of Squares
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2022 .11
-
square rose
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .05
-
CiteSpace에 기반한 다중모드 사회 기호학(1999-2019)의 가시화 분석
한국디자인리서치학회
2019 .01
-
모리스 기호학에 기초한 문화상품 디자인에 관한 연구
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2024 .06
-
A Design Process for Next-generation Products: Securing Leadtime and Multilateral Inferences through Exo and Endo Human Factors
Archives of Design Research
2020 .11
-
red square
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2019 .11
-
시각디자인으로서 항로표지 시각물의 조형성과 기호학적 분석 - 퍼스(Peirce)의 기호학적 유형분류를 바탕으로 -
한국공간디자인학회 논문집
2021 .01
-
정부상징의 기호학적 분석 및 문제점 검토
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2021 .05
-
남성 패션 일러스트레이션에 나타나는 기호학적 특성 - 모리스의 기호학을 중심으로 –
한국의류산업학회지
2024 .08
-
Table of Squares
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2022 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Effect of IL-4 on the Development and Function of Memory-like CD8 T Cells in the Peripheral Lymphoid Tissues
Hi-Jung Pa
,
k
,
A
외 6명
Immune Network
2016
.04
Early results with the Mutaf technique : a novel offmidline approach in pilonidal sinus surgery
Musa Zo
,
lu
,
İb
외 6명
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016
.05
연구자로서의 의사 인생 2막을 시작하며
최근주
BT NEWS
2016
.04
한국에서 뉴저지로, 그리고 다시 한국으로
김태형
BT NEWS
2016
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-658-002894070