메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sung-Gul Hwang (Hongik University) Sangwon Lee (Yonsei University)
저널정보
한국디자인학회 Archives of Design Research Archives of Design Research Vol.33 No.4 (Wn.136)
발행연도
2020.11
수록면
5 - 16 (12page)
DOI
10.15187/adr.2020.11.33.4.5

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background : When making business-critical decisions in future consumer innovations, very few methods have a true influence on stakeholders. A well-known weakness of current future innovation methods is the lack of multidisciplinary resonance since a true future innovation does not carry consumption data – inductive reasonings - nor predefined patterns of consumption – deductive reasonings - as primary sources.
As a result of not being able to acquire future decisions early on, companies with insufficient lead time have challenges in planning and realizing future innovations.
Methods : To promote and influence multidisciplinary stakeholders’ decision making, a future innovation process was composed featuring a full cycle of three types of reasoning: deductive, inductive, and abductive. Based on unpaired groups of concepts generated from the proposed process and a general process in comparison, the conclusive effectiveness of the processes was evaluated by industry experts in terms of innovation decision readiness.
Results : The proposed innovation process resulted in improvements in the levels of assurance, structuredness and decision influence. However, there had been a compromise in the level of objectivity due to reduced immediate empathy.
Conclusions : By structuring a process to reinforce the articulation and defensibility of the appropriation of future innovation based on diverse reasonings in a multidisciplinary context, the proposed process has shown improvements in key attributes of the outcomes that contribute to decision making in future innovations, while simultaneously allowing more lead time due to early decisions independent of prior references or emerging signs of consumption.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Hypothesis
3. Result and Discussion
4. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-658-001583844