메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
김영환 (부경대)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집 第32次 東北亞細亞文化學會 聯合國際學術大會 [3개 학회 공동개최]
발행연도
2016.7
수록면
162 - 166 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Ren is basic concept of Confucianism. But we encounter difficult problems if we intend to understand it with consistency and comprehensiveness. It can be understood as ethical virtue of political leaders. Confucius proposed this concept as a remedy of social turmoil of his time, the Spring and Autumn period. Ren reflects the spirit of the age, Confucius regarded it as essential for Chinse social order and international peace( for the Emperor and expulsion of Barbarians, 尊王攘夷) Ren also can be understood as characteristics of ideal leadership, which will end the social disorder. In Analects Ren contains earlier meaning of Ren. For example, Confucian remarks on Kwan Tzu that Kwan was humanistic is quite surprising. Because he was realistic politician. But it is not surprising if we remember the earlier meaning layer of Ren which traces back to the Book of Odes in which Ren is connected with braveness, excellence. manliness of ruling class rather than ethical virtues. It was originally simple and practical concept which can contribute to common goods. This meaning has been forgotten for ages long. But Confucius emphasized humanistic characteristics very much in Ren. So, in Analects, the concept Ren seems to be inconsistent, have difficulty in understanding as unitary concept. Concept of Ren has been widened greatly in Confucius’s era. It has become de facto different concepts. homonymy.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-910-001021523