지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
‘Yeog Eo Yu Hae’ is a Chinese study book from the later part of the Joseon Dynasty which was published by a national translation organization named Sa Yeog Won in 1690. In this book there are 4,586 vocabulary words, and for each of which there is a pronunciation and translation in Humminjeongeum. There are many studies on this book related to lexicology, the edition or phonology, but there has been no research on the variant forms of the Chinese characters. In this book, a lot of Chinese characters were written with variant forms. However, many of the characters with variant forms are very difficult to recognize, which then results in difficulties for other researchers whose field of expertise is not Chinese characters.
In the context of normal Chinese characters we analyze the variant forms of Chinese characters in this book in two situations: one character for one variant form and one character for variety of variant forms, from two perspectives: component and structure. The results can be classified into 10 types, from type 1 to type 9 is under the one character for one variant form situation, and type 10 is under one character for variety of variant forms situation. There are: 1) component as radical’s increaser; 2) component as radical’s omission; 3) component increaser; 4) component omission; 5) component replacement; 6) component transformation; 8) component"s complex transformation; 9) character’s structural transformation; 10) component transformation in one character for variety of variant forms. Most examples of variant forms are stroke omissions. Chinese characters are very complicated for non-Chinese native speakers, and even Chinese people. The ancient people who lived in a period without prescribed orthography sometimes omitted the stroke of a Chinese character to make it simpler. Some characters, however, are the opposite.
We have found an unprecedented phenomenon that there are few Chinese characters that have two or more variant forms from which it can then be supposed that variant forms were also very diverse in Korea in ancient times. Some variant forms not only can be found in literature from an earlier period, such as in the Silla Dynasty and in the Koryo Dynasty, but also from later times after this book was published. It shows that Korean literature has inherited some of the variant forms of Chinese characters.
As a very important part of sinology overseas, this study can fill the shortage concerning variant forms of Chinese characters both in China and Korea. It can also be the theoretical basis for accepting sinology and for the diffusion of history in Korea. As some of the variant forms only appeared in this book, these cannot be found in known literature now, but additional study in the future is needed to prove whether these characters are unique in Korea or not.
In the context of normal Chinese characters we analyze the variant forms of Chinese characters in this book in two situations: one character for one variant form and one character for variety of variant forms, from two perspectives: component and structure. The results can be classified into 10 types, from type 1 to type 9 is under the one character for one variant form situation, and type 10 is under one character for variety of variant forms situation. There are: 1) component as radical’s increaser; 2) component as radical’s omission; 3) component increaser; 4) component omission; 5) component replacement; 6) component transformation; 8) component"s complex transformation; 9) character’s structural transformation; 10) component transformation in one character for variety of variant forms. Most examples of variant forms are stroke omissions. Chinese characters are very complicated for non-Chinese native speakers, and even Chinese people. The ancient people who lived in a period without prescribed orthography sometimes omitted the stroke of a Chinese character to make it simpler. Some characters, however, are the opposite.
We have found an unprecedented phenomenon that there are few Chinese characters that have two or more variant forms from which it can then be supposed that variant forms were also very diverse in Korea in ancient times. Some variant forms not only can be found in literature from an earlier period, such as in the Silla Dynasty and in the Koryo Dynasty, but also from later times after this book was published. It shows that Korean literature has inherited some of the variant forms of Chinese characters.
As a very important part of sinology overseas, this study can fill the shortage concerning variant forms of Chinese characters both in China and Korea. It can also be the theoretical basis for accepting sinology and for the diffusion of history in Korea. As some of the variant forms only appeared in this book, these cannot be found in known literature now, but additional study in the future is needed to prove whether these characters are unique in Korea or not.
목차
中國語抄錄
Ⅰ. 緖言
Ⅱ. ≪譯語類解≫所錄異體字類型
Ⅲ. 結語
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
≪異體字字典≫的應用與未來
동양학
2018 .01
-
한자의 이체자 분화 현상 고찰
중국어문학논집
2021 .02
-
新出字形의 접근방법과 판독유형
민족문화
2015 .12
-
『신찬자경』의 이체자 유형 분류 ― 간략화와 증번화를 중심으로
중국학
2019 .01
-
《譯語類解補》異體字硏究
동아인문학
2020 .12
-
異體字에 대한 인문학적 고찰
漢字漢文敎育
2020 .01
-
현대 중국 사회에서의 한국 고유한자 ‘國字’의 존재 양상 분석
외국학연구
2021 .12
-
『新撰字鏡』 難字 考釋 七例
중국어문학논집
2015 .04
-
‘箕’ 이체자 자형의 변화 양상 연구
중국학
2021 .09
-
非正字形 偏旁이 固定的으로 사용되는 異體字의 생성 고찰
중국언어연구
2015 .04
-
漢字․漢語 敎學方案 연구Ⅲ
중국문학연구
2022 .02
-
한국 한자와 중국 간화자의 학습 상관성에 관한 대학생 인식 및 학습 실태 연구 - 대학 학부생 중국어 학습자를 중심으로
중국문화연구
2019 .08
-
現代中國 인터넷 新字 小考
중국문화연구
2019 .11
-
教育用基础汉字析议
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2021 .11
-
초급중국어 학습자의 한자 및 한자교육에 대한 인식조사 연구 - 전공계열별 분석을 중심으로 -
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
The Impact of Palatalization Rate on Phonological Variants: A Corpus-based Study of Word-final /t/ in American English
언어학 연구
2024 .10
-
중국 인명용자 규범의 변화 양상 고찰
중국어문학논집
2018 .02
-
淺談簡化字對漢字敎學的負面影響
중국언어연구
2018 .01
-
문․사․철 활용 한자교수법을 위한 제언
중국학
2015 .01
-
文字 訓詁의 視覺에서 본 ‘簡體字表’에서 명시한 주의할 사항에 대한 소고
중국어문학논집
2017 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-001-002024960