지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.6
- 수록면
- 35 - 62 (28page)
- DOI
- 10.37967/emh.2017.06.136.35
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The ending ‘-deunji’ is divided into single construction and reduplication construction based on the number of proposition combined. It may be used as a final ending, connective ending, or ending of embedded sentence in terms of the presence or types of following elements. This study examines various usage of ‘-deunji’ particularly in a form of the reduplication construction such as ‘-deunji, -deunji’ and analyzes its syntactic and semantic characteristics.
First, the primary condition of using ‘-deunji’ is the availability of the list of items for selection, and therefore the ending does not merely require the performance of selection. This may be supported by the fact that ‘-deunji’ is often employed in the reduplication construction to represent the meaninglessness of selection, and that it also appears in a form of ‘infinitival construction + -deunji.’ On the other hand, the form of ‘proposition + -deunji’ contains a semantic feature so that it can be repeated as ‘ending 1, ending 2, ....., ending n + following phrase,’ when the range or standard of selection is decided by the characteristics of the following phrase. However, it is difficult to conclude that the preceding endings merely function to enumerate items, while the last ‘ending n’ has a distinct function.
According to this study, the reduplication construction of ‘-deunji, –deunji’ can be divided into ‘-deunji -deunji + following phrase’ and ‘-deunji -deunji + hada.’ First of all, the form of ‘-deunji -deunji + following phrase’ can be sub-categorized in accordance with the presence of the expression that characterizes the listed objects in the following phrase. In the form where the reduplication construction of ‘-deunji’ is followed by the phrase, the necessity of selection varies depending on the proposition in the phrase. The use of the form depends on the necessity of selection, and the form can be distinguished by the way in which the followed expression imposes limitation on the ‘-deunji’ phrase. In this respect, this article argues that ‘-deunji -deunji + following phrase’ has three types in regard to the openness of proposition list and the necessity of selection: extreme openness, semi-openness, and closeness.
The first type is conditioned by the complete absence of the following phrase expression that intends to define the category or characteristics of the listed proposition. In this case, the reliability of the former “deunji” statement does not affect the meaning of following phrase, and other objects can be listed as many as the speaker wants, so it shows the extreme openness.
The second type is used when the expression that defines the category or selection criteria of listed propositions is followed by the phrase that contains semi-openness in the followed expression. This type can be divided again based on whether or not the followed phrase or noun (phrase) presents the selection criteria that characterizes the listed objects. The latter pattern is often used when the speaker only intends to provide a list of objects.
Lastly, the third type is the expression that put a limit on the number of listed propositions and selections in the following phrase, and it therefore represents the closeness of listed objects. Therefore, the pattern of extreme openness does not demand the listener’s act of selection, while that of semi-openness and closeness requires the performance of selection.
First, the primary condition of using ‘-deunji’ is the availability of the list of items for selection, and therefore the ending does not merely require the performance of selection. This may be supported by the fact that ‘-deunji’ is often employed in the reduplication construction to represent the meaninglessness of selection, and that it also appears in a form of ‘infinitival construction + -deunji.’ On the other hand, the form of ‘proposition + -deunji’ contains a semantic feature so that it can be repeated as ‘ending 1, ending 2, ....., ending n + following phrase,’ when the range or standard of selection is decided by the characteristics of the following phrase. However, it is difficult to conclude that the preceding endings merely function to enumerate items, while the last ‘ending n’ has a distinct function.
According to this study, the reduplication construction of ‘-deunji, –deunji’ can be divided into ‘-deunji -deunji + following phrase’ and ‘-deunji -deunji + hada.’ First of all, the form of ‘-deunji -deunji + following phrase’ can be sub-categorized in accordance with the presence of the expression that characterizes the listed objects in the following phrase. In the form where the reduplication construction of ‘-deunji’ is followed by the phrase, the necessity of selection varies depending on the proposition in the phrase. The use of the form depends on the necessity of selection, and the form can be distinguished by the way in which the followed expression imposes limitation on the ‘-deunji’ phrase. In this respect, this article argues that ‘-deunji -deunji + following phrase’ has three types in regard to the openness of proposition list and the necessity of selection: extreme openness, semi-openness, and closeness.
The first type is conditioned by the complete absence of the following phrase expression that intends to define the category or characteristics of the listed proposition. In this case, the reliability of the former “deunji” statement does not affect the meaning of following phrase, and other objects can be listed as many as the speaker wants, so it shows the extreme openness.
The second type is used when the expression that defines the category or selection criteria of listed propositions is followed by the phrase that contains semi-openness in the followed expression. This type can be divided again based on whether or not the followed phrase or noun (phrase) presents the selection criteria that characterizes the listed objects. The latter pattern is often used when the speaker only intends to provide a list of objects.
Lastly, the third type is the expression that put a limit on the number of listed propositions and selections in the following phrase, and it therefore represents the closeness of listed objects. Therefore, the pattern of extreme openness does not demand the listener’s act of selection, while that of semi-openness and closeness requires the performance of selection.
목차
1. 서론
2. 논의의 범위와 연결어미 ‘－든지’의 기본 의미
3. 중첩구성 연결어미 ‘－든지’의 통사 · 의미적 특징
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
문법 교육을 위한 구의 개념 정립
한글
2022 .12
-
複合連体句内の意味関係 : 動詞句と形容詞句の意味関係を中心に
일본연구
2019 .02
-
Notes on Mood Phrase and Modal Phrase for English
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2022 .05
-
중세국어 어미 중첩구성 연구 - 통사특성을 중심으로 -
한말연구
2024 .03
-
16세기 국어의 어미 중첩구성 연구
한말연구
2018 .01
-
영어 구 구조의 인지적 개념화: 이동 사건의 경로 중심으로
언어과학연구
2020 .03
-
한국어 학습자의 문장 구조 다양화를 위한 관형절 내포문 사용 양상 연구
이중언어학
2018 .01
-
『한국어기초사전』의 구 단위 표제어 선정 방안 연구
한국사전학
2023 .05
-
Embedded Declaratives in Korean
언어와 정보
2018 .02
-
자연언어에 나타나는 어와 구의 인터페이스에 관한 연구 : 일한 양 언어의 명사 연결 형태를 중심으로
일어일문학
2017 .08
-
‘인명고유명사구’와 ‘지칭·호칭명사구’ 결합의 통사적 특성 연구
한국어학
2016 .05
-
A Proper Construal of Infinitival Phrases in English
영어영문학연구
2020 .01
-
‘So’ as a TP-substituting Propositional Anaphor
영어학
2022 .01
-
韩汉重叠结构对比研究 ― 以普遍共性为主
중국학
2015 .01
-
‘아무’의 형태·통사·의미에 대하여
언어학
2015 .01
-
한국어의 중첩현상과 단어형성 : 강릉방언을 중심으로
국어국문학
2015 .09
-
명사구, 명사절, 관형사절
한말연구
2018 .01
-
성철 선사의 간화선법 일고
禪學(선학)
2018 .01
-
학문목적 한국어 쓰기 학습자를 위한 자기인용의 ‘-다고 하-’ 구문 교육방안
언어와 정보사회
2016 .03
-
소유-예속관계와 형용사 소유주어구 (領主句) - ‘王冕死了父親’과의 비교를 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2022 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0