지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.7
- 수록면
- 77 - 85 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to present practical alternatives for genuine reform that a majority of the people. In particular, the korean democratic crisis will review the institutional reform as view that it can overcome the reform of political relations the government’s constitution amendment, it can substantially advance democracy.
Institutional development has binding power the behavior of individuals or groups. Because the system can change culture, and culture affects the system.
Overall when compared with developed democracies; that seek between compromise and stability and social peace, is not nearly all is not a Presidential system but Parliamentary government or Semi-presidentialism. Parliamentary government, Semi-presidentialism has a longer term and stabler for more than Presidential system. It calls for a major change in the wisdom of the relationship between conflict resolution and the relationship between democracy and the democratic government.
But constitutional reforms can never be a panacea. Also reform of the constitution does not mean that many structural problems can suddenly be solved. However, there is no such thing as false choice, as it is delaying institutional reform. It is necessary that the serious and repetitive the problem is, the more fundamental it is to innovate. Reform of the Constitution and the political relations law is one of the key pillars of fundamental reform.
Importantly, institutional reforms are not necessary the best. But the sake of the Constitution should recognizes that it is a crucial task that must be reformed just like any other part. When the bring the Constitution and the political relations law to the extent of the problem what matters is the integration of civil participation, government organization and conflict and systems. Direct democracy, indirect democracy participation and institution are not a matter of choice between the two sides. It is not necessary to criticized participation by emphasizing representational democracy.
Nor should we deny the cause of the introduction of participatory democracy. The choice between participation and the institution, centers of modern democracy, cannot be a desirable alternative. When the happens mixed democracy can be a viable choice for direct democracy based on representational democracy. In the 21st century, when we consider ourselves in Korean reality, sophisticated institution to transform; be regarded as an ideal regime, the Constitution into a more to transform the constitution. There is a need for a institutional designing of the development of human conditions connected to the well-being of human beings. because the institution should exist for human-beings.
Institutional development has binding power the behavior of individuals or groups. Because the system can change culture, and culture affects the system.
Overall when compared with developed democracies; that seek between compromise and stability and social peace, is not nearly all is not a Presidential system but Parliamentary government or Semi-presidentialism. Parliamentary government, Semi-presidentialism has a longer term and stabler for more than Presidential system. It calls for a major change in the wisdom of the relationship between conflict resolution and the relationship between democracy and the democratic government.
But constitutional reforms can never be a panacea. Also reform of the constitution does not mean that many structural problems can suddenly be solved. However, there is no such thing as false choice, as it is delaying institutional reform. It is necessary that the serious and repetitive the problem is, the more fundamental it is to innovate. Reform of the Constitution and the political relations law is one of the key pillars of fundamental reform.
Importantly, institutional reforms are not necessary the best. But the sake of the Constitution should recognizes that it is a crucial task that must be reformed just like any other part. When the bring the Constitution and the political relations law to the extent of the problem what matters is the integration of civil participation, government organization and conflict and systems. Direct democracy, indirect democracy participation and institution are not a matter of choice between the two sides. It is not necessary to criticized participation by emphasizing representational democracy.
Nor should we deny the cause of the introduction of participatory democracy. The choice between participation and the institution, centers of modern democracy, cannot be a desirable alternative. When the happens mixed democracy can be a viable choice for direct democracy based on representational democracy. In the 21st century, when we consider ourselves in Korean reality, sophisticated institution to transform; be regarded as an ideal regime, the Constitution into a more to transform the constitution. There is a need for a institutional designing of the development of human conditions connected to the well-being of human beings. because the institution should exist for human-beings.
목차
Ⅰ. 緖論
Ⅱ. 制度改革의 必要性
Ⅲ. 憲法改革의 主要 方向
Ⅳ. 政治關係法 改革의 主要 內容
Ⅴ. 結論
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Why Are South Korean Citizens Dissatisfied with Democracy?
비교민주주의연구
2019 .01
-
대의민주주의를 넘어, 하이브리드 민주주의는 가능한가? -새로운 민주적 거버넌스 모델을 위한 시론-
공법연구
2020 .12
-
The Current State of South Korea’s Democracy
JIAS
2016 .01
-
자유주의, 민주주의 그리고 자유민주주의
원광법학
2015 .01
-
A Study of the Performance of Reform Institutions: Focusing on the Evolution of Public Sector Reforms in Ghana
국제개발협력
2019 .12
-
Social Conditions of Village Democracy in South Korea
Journal of Asian Sociology
2018 .03
-
경제 영역에서의 민주주의에 관한 고찰
경제법연구
2021 .12
-
공화민주주의모델의 헌법적 가치구성의 의의와 한계점
한양법학
2017 .11
-
The Effect of Industrial, Financial, Technological and Environmental Development Indicators on the Democracy Level in Emerging Economies
Journal of Economic Development
2022 .06
-
Administrative Reform : State and Democracy Revisited
한국공공관리학보
2018 .09
-
민주적 대의제의 실현
법학연구
2018 .01
-
시민의 입법참여와 헌법 - 국민발안제 도입논의를 중심으로
외법논집
2018 .01
-
일터민주주의를 위한 노동법적 과제
노동법학
2020 .09
-
대의민주주의와 국민참여에 관한 소고
공법학연구
2020 .11
-
Myanmar’s Slow and Uncertain Path to Real Democracy and Reform
Global Asia
2020 .09
-
민주주의의 의미와 본질에 대한 고찰: 대의민주주의와 참여민주주의-심의민주주의의 관계를 중심으로
헌법논총
2018 .01
-
‘정당 만들기’ 프로젝트 수업 이야기: 정치에 참여한다는 것의 의미
사회과수업연구
2017 .01
-
Judging Democracy in Canada
헌법재판연구
2021 .12
-
경제와 민주주의: 적인가, 친구인가?
제도와 경제
2017 .01
-
민주주의의 자유편향적 발전과 그 결과 : 민주주의의 이름으로 추진된 신자유주의적 개혁
사회이론
2017 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-910-001195699