지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.8
- 수록면
- 1 - 98 (98page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
School violence has emerged as a social problem in Korea and developed countries around the 1980s. The severity of school violence is influenced by a variety of factors, including admission-oriented education, lack of care, and exposure to the media. As school violence became more and more serious, the government enacted the Act on the Prevention of School Violence in 2004.
As a result of efforts to solve school violence throughout society, the incidence of school violence has decreased every year since 2010. However, school violence goes beyond mere physical power and makes it intelligent by insults, profanity, sexual abuse, bullying and cyber violence. It is difficult to conclude that violence is disappearing simply because the incidence of school violence is diminishing, and there is still a lot of school violence that is not revealed by the survey. School violence measure autonomy committees must take prompt action on students who have been injured and students who have been victimized. However, as unprofessional teachers and parents are members of the committee, they often take different actions for similar issues. It also fails to comply with the principles and procedures of law enforcement and does not consistently handle issues. Parents are increasingly rejecting decisions because they do not trust the committee. As a result, school violence reconsideration and administrative appeals are increasing every year.
The review process should also be improved. The fundamental problem of the school violence review is that the organization that appeals the injustice of the victim and the student is divided into the regional committee and the disciplinary coordination committee, so that both the students and the victim students are confused if they make contradictory decisions to be.
The role of Gyeonggi-Do to prevent and cope with school violence is as follows. First, we need to educate professional lecturers on prevention education for school violence. According to the School Violence Prevention Act, each school should conduct school violence preventive education for students, staff and parents at least once a semester, but the education is not made faithful because of lack of professional instructors. Second, preliminary parent education should be conducted. In Gyeonggi-Do, it is necessary to conduct preliminary parent education through the Health and Welfare Center and the Youth Counseling and Welfare Center, and to cooperate with the Education Office to implement preliminary parent education as part of student experience activities. Third, it is necessary to strengthen the professionalism of the school violence council autonomy committee and unify the reconsideration organization. If students and parents trust the results of the first review of school violence, the appeal will be reduced. In addition, it is desirable to unify the reconsideration mechanism separately from the decrease in the number of reconsideration, and collectively address the problems of the student and the victim.
As a result of efforts to solve school violence throughout society, the incidence of school violence has decreased every year since 2010. However, school violence goes beyond mere physical power and makes it intelligent by insults, profanity, sexual abuse, bullying and cyber violence. It is difficult to conclude that violence is disappearing simply because the incidence of school violence is diminishing, and there is still a lot of school violence that is not revealed by the survey. School violence measure autonomy committees must take prompt action on students who have been injured and students who have been victimized. However, as unprofessional teachers and parents are members of the committee, they often take different actions for similar issues. It also fails to comply with the principles and procedures of law enforcement and does not consistently handle issues. Parents are increasingly rejecting decisions because they do not trust the committee. As a result, school violence reconsideration and administrative appeals are increasing every year.
The review process should also be improved. The fundamental problem of the school violence review is that the organization that appeals the injustice of the victim and the student is divided into the regional committee and the disciplinary coordination committee, so that both the students and the victim students are confused if they make contradictory decisions to be.
The role of Gyeonggi-Do to prevent and cope with school violence is as follows. First, we need to educate professional lecturers on prevention education for school violence. According to the School Violence Prevention Act, each school should conduct school violence preventive education for students, staff and parents at least once a semester, but the education is not made faithful because of lack of professional instructors. Second, preliminary parent education should be conducted. In Gyeonggi-Do, it is necessary to conduct preliminary parent education through the Health and Welfare Center and the Youth Counseling and Welfare Center, and to cooperate with the Education Office to implement preliminary parent education as part of student experience activities. Third, it is necessary to strengthen the professionalism of the school violence council autonomy committee and unify the reconsideration organization. If students and parents trust the results of the first review of school violence, the appeal will be reduced. In addition, it is desirable to unify the reconsideration mechanism separately from the decrease in the number of reconsideration, and collectively address the problems of the student and the victim.
목차
[표지]
[연구요약]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적
제2절 연구의 범위와 방법
제3절 선행연구
[제2장 학교폭력의 이해]
제1절 학교폭력의 개요
제2절 학교폭력의 현황
[제3장 학교폭력 대응 사례]
제1절 국내 학교폭력 대응
제2절 해외의 학교폭력 대응 사례
[제4장 학교폭력 처리 절차 및 문제점]
제1절 학교폭력 처리 절차
제2절 학교폭력대책의 문제점
제3절 재심 제도의 문제점
[제5장 결론 및 정책 제언]
제1절 결론
제2절 정책 제언
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한 법률의 문제점 고찰
인문사회 21
2018 .01
-
학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한 법률의 문제점과 개선방안
원광법학
2016 .01
-
부모 간 폭력에 노출된 경험이대학생의 데이트폭력 가해에 미치는 영향: 젠더감수성의 조절효과
지역과 세계
2019 .01
-
젠더기반폭력의 피해자 맥락성에 관한 담론
한국치안행정논집
2020 .01
-
사무직 근로자의 직장폭력피해경험 연구– ‘폭력풍토(Violence Climate)’를 중심으로 -
한국공안행정학회보
2018 .01
-
한일 양국 초등학생 학교폭력 실태 비교연구
일본근대학연구
2017 .01
-
학교폭력예방법에 대한 고찰 - 법적용 실제에 있어서의 문제를 중심으로 -
홍익법학
2015 .01
-
가정 내 정서적 폭력에 대한 개념적 이해와 피해자 보호
피해자학연구
2020 .01
-
학교폭력으로 인한 손해에 대한 민사책임
법학논총
2018 .01
-
현행 학교폭력예방법의 문제점 및 개선방안 – 학교폭력의 행위유형과 가해 주체의 범위와 관련하여 –
경희법학
2022 .12
-
학교폭력의 원인과 대응방안에 관한 연구 - 가정적 요인을 중심으로 -
치안정책연구
2015 .01
-
학교폭력 예방을 위한 지역전문 프로그램에 관한 연구
한국경찰학회보
2021 .01
-
한국의 학교폭력 실태 및 시사점: 학교폭력예방법을 중심으로
한국사회안전학회지
2018 .05
-
가정폭력 피해경험이 데이트폭력에 미치는 영향 : 관계만족도의 조절효과를 중심으로
한국경호경비학회지
2021 .01
-
학교폭력 사안처리 개선 및 상담 개입 방안에 대한 고찰 : 초등학교 사례를 중심으로
한국교육학연구
2018 .01
-
공격성이 학교폭력 가해행동에 미치는영향에서 폭력정당화의 조절효과
교정담론
2023 .04
-
대구지역 데이트폭력의 실태 및 요인 분석
치안정책연구
2018 .01
-
가정폭력과 학교폭력 피해경험이 아동의 비행에 미치는 영향: 자아존중감의 조절효과
한국공안행정학회보
2019 .01
-
학교폭력개념의 법적정립을 통한 학교폭력 대응방안
유럽헌법연구
2015 .01
-
일본의 데이트 폭력 문제와 예방에 관한 검토
법과 정책연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
학교폭력의 현실과 개선을 위한 정책방안
김영진
,
길태영
법학연구
2017
.06
중학생의 학교폭력 피해경험 및 가해경험의 변화 양상 : 다변량 다층 잠재성장모형을 적용한 개인 및 학교효과 분석
노언경
,
이현정
,
이은수
외 1명
한국청소년연구
2017
.02
학교 폭력 예방 및 효율적 대처 방안 : 정부의 학교폭력 근절 종합대책에 대한 검토를 중심으로
허종렬
저스티스
2013
.02
학교폭력 사안처리 유형화 및 영향요인 : 고등학교를 중심으로
김은석
,
장미수
아시아교육연구
2019
.03
청소년의 학교폭력, 가족탄력성, 무망감, 우울, 자살생각 간의 구조적 관계
김치건
한국아동복지학
2018
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-309-001554139