지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to examine the characteristics of causative in Korean and Japanese by analyzing Korean and Japanese causative both in Korean-Japanese and Japanese-Korean translation data. Especially, focusing on the syntactic causative ‘-key hada’ in korean. For analysis, first the syntactic causative in korean and the Japanese corresponding to Korean syntactic causative was selected. And a causative proper use was divided into manipulation, compulsion, permission, and direction. In addition, ‘-key hada’ verb was classified into the main verb, the helping verb, and the pro-verb.
The results are presented as follows: the Japanese corresponding to Korean syntactic causative includes transitive verb use, causative passive, and other constructs similar to causative, i.e., ようにする(youni suru), and ように命じる(youi meiziru). In the case of manipulation, there existed inanimate subject which was personified. There existed two types of adjectival causative, i.e., causation and non-causation in Korean. Accordingly, the corresponding difference was shown in the Japanese translation. In the case of ‘-key hay cuda’ which was a combined form of syntactic causative and dative verbs, there existed a use without causative meaning. This use was translated into ‘てくれる’(te kureru) and the use with causative meaning was represented by ‘てあげる’(te ageru) in Japanese. There existed a difference between compulsion and directions. Directions in the syntactic causative in korean represented a state change of causee, whereas the compulsion did not. Regarding non-causative sentences which were combined to the verbs of reference meaning, i. e., ‘よう に 命じる’, extended use of the verbs was observed with appearance of the verb ‘言う’. Furthermore, imperative forms were revealed to be considered as peripheral causative.
The results are presented as follows: the Japanese corresponding to Korean syntactic causative includes transitive verb use, causative passive, and other constructs similar to causative, i.e., ようにする(youni suru), and ように命じる(youi meiziru). In the case of manipulation, there existed inanimate subject which was personified. There existed two types of adjectival causative, i.e., causation and non-causation in Korean. Accordingly, the corresponding difference was shown in the Japanese translation. In the case of ‘-key hay cuda’ which was a combined form of syntactic causative and dative verbs, there existed a use without causative meaning. This use was translated into ‘てくれる’(te kureru) and the use with causative meaning was represented by ‘てあげる’(te ageru) in Japanese. There existed a difference between compulsion and directions. Directions in the syntactic causative in korean represented a state change of causee, whereas the compulsion did not. Regarding non-causative sentences which were combined to the verbs of reference meaning, i. e., ‘よう に 命じる’, extended use of the verbs was observed with appearance of the verb ‘言う’. Furthermore, imperative forms were revealed to be considered as peripheral causative.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 사동의 의미 분류에 관한 연구
Ⅲ. 한국어 장형사동에 관한 연구
Ⅳ. 연구 방법
Ⅴ. 결과 및 분석
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국어 형태적 사동 표현과 중국어 무표지 사동 표현 대조 분석
비교문화연구
2022 .10
-
중한사전 쌍음절형용사 사동 용법의 기술에 관한 연구
중국학보
2017 .01
-
表致使義的“得”字句與相應的韓語使動句對比?究
중국학논총
2015 .05
-
'V得' 결과구문과 사동구문의 상호교체 및 의미 분석에 관한 小考
중국학보
2017 .01
-
致使、非致使状态变化(COS)比较研究 ― 英语、韩语和汉语之比较
중국학보
2021 .08
-
CAUSATIVIZATION IN HIN DI : AN ALTERNATIVE VIEW
남아시아연구
2017 .02
-
A Study on Metonymy Mechanism of the Causative Construction “X+Shi+NP+VP” in Modern Chinese
Journal of China Studies
2019 .01
-
心理動詞の使役文と他動詞文の比較 : 自動詞(-u)-他動詞(-eru)型を中心に
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .10
-
만주어 접사의 문법화와 퉁구스계 언어에서의 분화
중앙아시아연구
2021 .12
-
경도지적장애 아동의 사동ㆍ피동문 이해
특수교육논총
2015 .02
-
태국어 ทำ과 ให้의 결합 관계 연구
동남아연구
2018 .01
-
명사형 사역동사 연구‒영어, 중국어, 일본어를 중심으로‒
일본근대학연구
2019 .01
-
자기옹호 상황글을 통한 발달장애인의 사동문·피동문 이해능력 연구
언어치료연구
2024 .07
-
한국과학교육학회지 논문의 글쓰기 사례 연구
한국과학교육학회지
2015 .01
-
『させてもらう』文の構文的特徴 －使役者の表れ方を中心として－
일본언어문화
2016 .01
-
現代日本語の「シテイル」と現代韓国語の「-고 있-」、「-어 있-」、「-었-」の対照研究 : 形容性動詞の「-었-」を中心に
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2015 .08
-
한국어 문장 유형 설정과 정상군의 홑문장 산출 양상에 대한 연구
문법교육
2016 .01
-
『梵亭言行錄』의 법문학적 함의
법학논총
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-910-001713599