지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第107號
- 발행연도
- 2017.12
- 수록면
- 7 - 29 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2017.12.107.7
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the introductory books on linguistics, containing general explanations on the basic knowledge of the overall research fields in general linguistics, the selection of the contents to include as basic knowledge of linguistics and the accuracy of its description are of the foremost importance. Therefore, this paper analyses the contents defining the Chinese characters in introductory linguistic books written and/or compiled by Korean linguists since 1990 to discuss what contents are essential to include as basic knowledge of the Chinese character system. Then, based on the discussion, it examines issues associated with the descriptions of the explained contents, focusing on differences from the general views held in Chinese linguistics and graphonomy. The findings of this paper on these two points may be summarized as follows:
The contents related to Chinese characters in introductory linguistic books can be categorized into seven aspects: origin, types of writing system, font change, the formation principles of Chinese characters (liushu), characteristics, number of characters and propagation. In view of the definitions provided for Chinese characters in Korean dictionaries and the Chinese characters described in Modern Chinese (現代漢語), these seven aspects are essentials to be included in the description of the basic knowledge about Chinese characters. In addition, the content of the modern simplified Chinese should be included.
The ‘types of writing system’ and ‘liushu’ display variances in different introductory books of linguistics, or differ from the general views held in Chinese graphonomy. In this paper, the two issues of (1) ‘classification of the types of writing system of Chinese characters by stages’ and (2) ‘explanation of the concepts of jiajie (假借) and zhuanzhu (轉注) among the six Chinese character formation principles(liushu)’ are examined based on the general views in Chinese graphonomy. In regards to (1), this paper points out the invalidity of classification by stages in contrast to the necessity of typal classification according to the classification criteria. In regards to (2), this paper clarifies the concept of ‘jiajie’ and what introductory books of linguistics have failed to provide correct explanation on it. Also, this paper points out erroneous explanations of zhuanzhu as ‘extension of meaning’ by introductory linguistic books, suggesting exclusion of zhuanzhu in the explanations of liushu for the ambiguity of concept.
The purpose of this paper is not to point out any fallacy in the explanation but to address the importance of basic knowledge in explaining the Chinese characters, an ideography, and to extend the discussion. It is argued that detailed contents of each aspect of the basic knowledge of Chinese character system be discussed further and a standardized system established regarding the concepts of the terms and basic knowledge of the Chinese graphonomy which can be universally applied to general linguistics and graphonomy.
The contents related to Chinese characters in introductory linguistic books can be categorized into seven aspects: origin, types of writing system, font change, the formation principles of Chinese characters (liushu), characteristics, number of characters and propagation. In view of the definitions provided for Chinese characters in Korean dictionaries and the Chinese characters described in Modern Chinese (現代漢語), these seven aspects are essentials to be included in the description of the basic knowledge about Chinese characters. In addition, the content of the modern simplified Chinese should be included.
The ‘types of writing system’ and ‘liushu’ display variances in different introductory books of linguistics, or differ from the general views held in Chinese graphonomy. In this paper, the two issues of (1) ‘classification of the types of writing system of Chinese characters by stages’ and (2) ‘explanation of the concepts of jiajie (假借) and zhuanzhu (轉注) among the six Chinese character formation principles(liushu)’ are examined based on the general views in Chinese graphonomy. In regards to (1), this paper points out the invalidity of classification by stages in contrast to the necessity of typal classification according to the classification criteria. In regards to (2), this paper clarifies the concept of ‘jiajie’ and what introductory books of linguistics have failed to provide correct explanation on it. Also, this paper points out erroneous explanations of zhuanzhu as ‘extension of meaning’ by introductory linguistic books, suggesting exclusion of zhuanzhu in the explanations of liushu for the ambiguity of concept.
The purpose of this paper is not to point out any fallacy in the explanation but to address the importance of basic knowledge in explaining the Chinese characters, an ideography, and to extend the discussion. It is argued that detailed contents of each aspect of the basic knowledge of Chinese character system be discussed further and a standardized system established regarding the concepts of the terms and basic knowledge of the Chinese graphonomy which can be universally applied to general linguistics and graphonomy.
목차
1. 서론
2. 언어학 개론서의 한자에 관한 내용
3. 한자에 관한 내용의 문제점
4. 결론
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (48)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
段玉裁 관점에서 본 ‘假借’ 현상과 그 의미 ― ≪說文解字注≫ 주석을 중심으로
중국학
2015 .01
-
『說文解字』 轉注 再考
중국문학연구
2021 .08
-
韓國 固有漢字의 造字原理 고찰
동양고전연구
2020 .01
-
외래어 표기과정에서의 현대 중국어 字義 확장과 교육방안 연구 ― 단음절 음역어를 중심으로
중국학
2016 .01
-
《呂氏春秋》高誘音注研究
인문학연구
2015 .01
-
19세기 중국어 書面語 교재 《文件自邇集》에 나타난 중국어 문법 고찰 : 《文件字句入門》과 《文件自邇集 · 注釋》의 내용 분석을 통하여
동아인문학
2019 .03
-
从韩汉辅音对比看韩国汉语教材的语音编排与注释 － 以韩国主流汉语教材的声母教学为例－
동아인문학
2019 .06
-
甲骨文에 보이는 ‘其’의 용법과 어법화 과정
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
인문언어학의 연구사적 검토와 비판적 전망
언어사실과 관점
2015 .01
-
한자어휘 교육을 위한 字義에 대한 이해
漢文敎育論集
2020 .01
-
한국의 중국어학 연구자 통계 및 연구경향 분석 —《中國文學》을 중심으로
중국문학
2019 .01
-
Generative Linguistics and Corpus Linguistics: Two Paradigms of Language Study and Their Applications to AI
언어과학
2022 .11
-
教育用基础汉字析议
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2021 .11
-
초급중국어 학습자의 한자 및 한자교육에 대한 인식조사 연구 - 전공계열별 분석을 중심으로 -
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
非対面コミュニケーションにおける場面認識 : 自称詞と対称詞の使用に注目して
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2016 .11
-
한중 중국어학 연구동향 실태분석 연구 : 학회지의 소논문을 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2015 .04
-
漢字․漢語 敎學方案 연구Ⅲ
중국문학연구
2022 .02
-
중국언어학 교육을 위한 전자교재에 대한 구상 시론
중국문화연구
2017 .08
-
중국 인명용자 규범의 변화 양상 고찰
중국어문학논집
2018 .02
-
淺談簡化字對漢字敎學的負面影響
중국언어연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
공정 모니터링 시스템의 품질 예측 및 불량요인 분석 알고리듬 개발
배석주
,
김성준
,
문병민
외 4명
대한산업공학회 추계학술대회 논문집
2013
.11
갑골문에서 본의와 인신의, 가차의 고찰
朴賢珠
중국어문학논집
2017
.10
2인칭 서술이 작품의 수용에 미친 영향 : 신경숙의 『엄마를 부탁해』를 중심으로
김외곤
한국현대문학연구
2013
.08
商代 갑골문에 보이는 ‘東’ 字素 字形 연구 : 東夷 관련 고문자 텍스트 DB 구축 과정의 일환
金經一
중국어문논역총간
2011
.01
텍스트언어학 이론 기반 정립을 위한 소쉬르의 일반언어학 이론 재검토 (1) : 소쉬르의 기호 개념과 텍스트 유형론
조원형
한국수사학회 학술대회
2007
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-820-001728659