지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to examine Kim Kyoshin’s journal historically and his philosophy of life and spirit of Christianity penetrating through the journal. The reason this author intends to look into Kim Kyoshin’s philosophy of life and Christian view of world with his journal is that this researcher has academic interest in considering his journal in the perspective of church history and also believes that his philosophy of life will play roles as religious criteria for Christians in Korea. This article stresses not only historical consideration which is the original mission of church history but also practical theology to seek the alternatives of Korean church.
There has been no research on Kim Kyoshin’s journal up until now. Despite that, the recent publication of 『Kim Kyoshin Il-bo』’s translation can be evaluated highly just as it is. While developing discussion here, this author sets force the opinion that it is needed to reconsider the popular view that Kim Kyoshin burnt Il-bo (日步) and also Kim Kyoshin’s Ii-il-il-saeng (一日一生, one day, one life) was not just because of Uchimura Kanzo’s influence.
Kim Kyoshin’s journals can be formally divided into two types: private journals, Il-bo, and open ones, Seongseo Tongsin (城西通信, News from the West of Seoul) and Seongjo Tongsin (聖朝通信, Bible and Chosen News). Out of 30 or journals, only two Il-bo are left now. They formed Kim Kyoshin’s inner space as the only field where he could unfold his thoughts with no constraints during the Japanese colonial era. Meanwhile, his open journals published on Seongseo Chosen serially tended to be more public and significantly contributed to the formation of directivity and identity of non-churchism and also the subscribers’ religious and spiritual growth. Examining Kim Kyoshin with his philosophy of life penetrating his journals, we can find three points of transition which are the 1910’s, 1920’s, and 1930’s approximately. Kim Kyoshin was considerably influenced by ‘Hak-yi-seong-in (學以成人, becoming a Confucian whole being through learning)’ which is the Confucian view of the world in the 1910’s, Uchimura Kanzo’s ‘Ii-il-il-saeng’ (一日一生, one day, one life) in the 1920’s, and ‘O-nuel-sal-yi (living today only, 今日生活)’ which is Ryu Yeongmo’s philosophy in the 1930’s. Kim Kyoshin did make efforts to realize his beliefs in his life concretely, and this can be summarized as his endeavoring for life according to one’s faith, all believers’ priesthood, and invisible church.
There has been no research on Kim Kyoshin’s journal up until now. Despite that, the recent publication of 『Kim Kyoshin Il-bo』’s translation can be evaluated highly just as it is. While developing discussion here, this author sets force the opinion that it is needed to reconsider the popular view that Kim Kyoshin burnt Il-bo (日步) and also Kim Kyoshin’s Ii-il-il-saeng (一日一生, one day, one life) was not just because of Uchimura Kanzo’s influence.
Kim Kyoshin’s journals can be formally divided into two types: private journals, Il-bo, and open ones, Seongseo Tongsin (城西通信, News from the West of Seoul) and Seongjo Tongsin (聖朝通信, Bible and Chosen News). Out of 30 or journals, only two Il-bo are left now. They formed Kim Kyoshin’s inner space as the only field where he could unfold his thoughts with no constraints during the Japanese colonial era. Meanwhile, his open journals published on Seongseo Chosen serially tended to be more public and significantly contributed to the formation of directivity and identity of non-churchism and also the subscribers’ religious and spiritual growth. Examining Kim Kyoshin with his philosophy of life penetrating his journals, we can find three points of transition which are the 1910’s, 1920’s, and 1930’s approximately. Kim Kyoshin was considerably influenced by ‘Hak-yi-seong-in (學以成人, becoming a Confucian whole being through learning)’ which is the Confucian view of the world in the 1910’s, Uchimura Kanzo’s ‘Ii-il-il-saeng’ (一日一生, one day, one life) in the 1920’s, and ‘O-nuel-sal-yi (living today only, 今日生活)’ which is Ryu Yeongmo’s philosophy in the 1930’s. Kim Kyoshin did make efforts to realize his beliefs in his life concretely, and this can be summarized as his endeavoring for life according to one’s faith, all believers’ priesthood, and invisible church.
목차
I. 서론
II. 김교신 일기의 종류와 그 특징
III. 삶의 전기(轉機)와 그 철학
IV. 삶의 철학과 생활로의 구현 형태
V. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
김교신 일보 연구: 김교신 일보가 살아남은 이유에 대한 역사적 추론
한국교회사학회지
2020 .01
-
김교신의 신사참배 인식 연구
신학논단
2020 .09
-
《성서조선》과 김교신, 그리고 함석헌-1
씨알의소리
2024 .09
-
‘성서조선사건’의 재검토
한국기독교신학논총
2021 .10
-
문학에 대한 김교신의 시각과 그의 글쓰기
한국문학과 예술
2025 .03
-
복음적 유자(儒者) : 김교신의 유교적-기독교적 정체성 이해
한국기독교와 역사
2019 .03
-
<기쁜소식성경>(Good News Bible)의 1992년 개정과 그 배경
성경원문연구
2020 .04
-
김교신(金敎臣)의 신학 분석 : 조직신학적 접근
한국기독교신학논총
2017 .04
-
김교신 수필 연구: 우언 활용과 관련하여
한국문학과 예술
2021 .03
-
최태용과 무교회주의: 김교신·우치무라와의 관계를 중심으로
한국기독교와 역사
2021 .09
-
김교신과 우치무라 간조- 무교회운동의 한일간 교류 -
日本思想
2016 .01
-
루터의 만인사제론과 한국교회의 개혁 과제
신학사상
2017 .01
-
김교신의 장개석(蔣介石) 인식 연구
신학논단
2015 .09
-
보성전문학교에서 김일성종합대학으로 : 식민지 지식인 김광진의 생애와 경제사 연구
역사학보
2016 .12
-
근대성과 상호문화성 – 신채호와 김교신을 중심으로
동서철학연구
2021 .12
-
신
수필미학
2020 .09
-
스즈키 하루노부의 ‘미인화’에 대한 일고찰
일본문화연구
2016 .07
-
诚邀信
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .11
-
네가 신이라면 외 1편
자음과모음
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-230-003120762