지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With the wider demand of self-government, local police system is more asked by citizens. Moon Jae-in government has a firm determination to introduce local police system nationalwide by 2020. Albeit limited Jeju Special Self-Governing Province has experienced local police system after 2006 and is the first province to introduce expanded local police system in 2018. On this dissertation certain criteria were presented in light of the korean law system and local situation how the task of national provincial police and local police is separately assumed. Recently korean government has emphasized introduction of the local government system on the level of federal nation and taking advantage of this government speech local government heads insisted introduction of local police system on the level of federal nation.
However the investigation authority as an important part of jurisdiction belongs to the central government, as long as korea forms a unitary state system. Besides investigation authority is associated with vertical separation of powers as one side of local self governing system, but has little to do with pariticipatory democracy as other side of it. So it does korean constitution and korean local government act. Accordingly investigation authority on local cases in korea must belong to national provincial police. But because administrative police area in the narrow sense like environmental, hygenic, health, forest and business police is aussumed by local governments, the inverstigation on cases in this area could be taken by local police. However on this area it must be investigated by national provincial police, if any corruption would be expected by local public servants or local government heads.
Compared with local police in federal system it could be thought that recommendation of korean police reform committee is insufficient for local democracy. But local government system on the level of federal nation does not mean the introduction of federal system, as long as korea has unitary system. So it does on domain of police system. The intension of local democracy does not mean the enhancement of the power of the local government head. In England it does not exist any mayor of broad regional area beside metropolitan municipality, so local police is independent from general administration and its chief. Japan is not also different from the england in terms of independence of police from local governmental heads. Especially inverstigation authority needs independence from local government like prosecution and trial.
Recommendation of korean police reform committee gives local polices the investigation authority on limited area like sexual violence, domestice violence and school violence and local government heads wider autohrity on personnel matters of police. It surpasses english and japanese models of local police systems.
Besides many tasks on domain of crime prevention would be assumed by local government and local police. On the process of tasktransfer from national provincial police to local police many legal acts must be revisioned. In and of themselves it needs great endeavour and time.
However the investigation authority as an important part of jurisdiction belongs to the central government, as long as korea forms a unitary state system. Besides investigation authority is associated with vertical separation of powers as one side of local self governing system, but has little to do with pariticipatory democracy as other side of it. So it does korean constitution and korean local government act. Accordingly investigation authority on local cases in korea must belong to national provincial police. But because administrative police area in the narrow sense like environmental, hygenic, health, forest and business police is aussumed by local governments, the inverstigation on cases in this area could be taken by local police. However on this area it must be investigated by national provincial police, if any corruption would be expected by local public servants or local government heads.
Compared with local police in federal system it could be thought that recommendation of korean police reform committee is insufficient for local democracy. But local government system on the level of federal nation does not mean the introduction of federal system, as long as korea has unitary system. So it does on domain of police system. The intension of local democracy does not mean the enhancement of the power of the local government head. In England it does not exist any mayor of broad regional area beside metropolitan municipality, so local police is independent from general administration and its chief. Japan is not also different from the england in terms of independence of police from local governmental heads. Especially inverstigation authority needs independence from local government like prosecution and trial.
Recommendation of korean police reform committee gives local polices the investigation authority on limited area like sexual violence, domestice violence and school violence and local government heads wider autohrity on personnel matters of police. It surpasses english and japanese models of local police systems.
Besides many tasks on domain of crime prevention would be assumed by local government and local police. On the process of tasktransfer from national provincial police to local police many legal acts must be revisioned. In and of themselves it needs great endeavour and time.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 제주특별자치도 자치경찰 사례
Ⅲ. 독일의 관점에서 바라본 지방경찰청(국가경찰)과 자치경찰간 사무배분 일반기준
Ⅳ. 우리나라에의 적용 - 수사 및 위험방지사무를 중심으로
Ⅴ. 자치경찰에 대한 광역지방자치단체(장)의 인사, 예산 관여, 직무지휘감독 등의 문제
Ⅵ. 타 행정기관 집행원조 및 경찰 상호간 협력의 문제
Ⅶ. 나가며
참고문헌
국문요약
Abstract
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
문재인 정부의 광역단위 자치경찰제에 관한 고찰
한국지방자치학회보
2017 .12
-
한국 자치경찰제의 도입 모형:정부안(홍익표의원 대표발의안) 검토를 중심으로
한국경찰학회보
2019 .01
-
자치경찰제 도입모델에 관한 검토- 문재인 정부 하에서의 논의를 중심으로 -
치안정책연구
2018 .01
-
문재인 정부 자치경찰제안에 대한 평가와 개선방안
한양법학
2019 .11
-
주요 국가 자치경찰제 운영현황 비교분석 : 견제·통제 방안을 중심으로
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2018 .08
-
지방분권시대의 성공적인 자치경찰제 추진을 위한탐색적 연구
한국경찰연구
2018 .01
-
자치경찰제 논의와 법정책적 소고
법학연구
2017 .01
-
자치경찰제의 발전을 위한 입법적 개선 과제 – 경찰권의 효율적 분산과 민주적 통제를 중심으로 –
한국경찰학회보
2022 .04
-
An Exploration of the Devolved Police System in England and Wales and its Implications for Korean Autonomous Police System
한국공안행정학회보
2021 .01
-
자치경찰 법제도의 문제점 및 시사점 연구
가천법학
2021 .09
-
경찰활동에 대한 시민 만족도에의 영향요인
한국치안행정논집
2020 .01
-
정부의 자치경찰제 도입방안의 개선방안과 과제
한국경찰학회보
2019 .01
-
미국의 Team Policing 사례 연구
한국공안행정학회보
2017 .01
-
A Study on the Operating Conditions and Implications of the Japanese Police System
한국범죄심리연구
2022 .09
-
한국 지역경찰에 있어서 경찰의 주민신뢰가 지역사회경찰활동 수용도에 미치는 영향
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .10
-
중국 공안교육제도에 관한 연구-중앙･지방 공안대학의 혁신시도를 중심으로-
경찰학논총
2016 .01
-
The New Structure of Police Governance and Its Impact on Police Service Delivery in the UK
한국경호경비학회지
2018 .06
-
日本自治警察制度の問題点と発展方策：国、地方、民間の役割り変化
한국공안행정학회보
2019 .01
-
영국경찰의 주민자치성 검토: 잉글랜드·웨일즈 지방을 중심으로
치안정책연구
2020 .01
-
Team Policing에 관한 연구: 구성요소와 시행 및 적용 시 쟁점을 중심으로
한국경찰학회보
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0