지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제109호
- 발행연도
- 2018.9
- 수록면
- 241 - 272 (32page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2018.09.109.241
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The “Japanese-Baekje” officials, who were Japanese-born individuals serving the Baekje government as officials, displayed impressive activities during the reign of King Seong-wang of Baekje, and particularly after the transfer of the Baekje capital to the Sabi region.
At the time, Baekje was trying to expand its territory to cover the Gaya region, and “Wae” Japan was also trying to secure regions that would serve as stable portals through which they could continuously receive advanced culture from the outside. With situations unfolding on each countries showing potentials to not only overlap but also benefit both sides, an era of Baekje-Wae cooperation was formed which gave birth to a new breed of officials who were the aforementioned ‘Japanese-Baekje’ officials. Baekje’s exchanges with Wae became more important than ever during the 550s, as Baekje’s confrontation with Goguryeo and Shilla grew more and more intense. The Japanese-Baekje officials played a crucial role at this juncture, as they were dispatched to Wae and requested Japanese military support (more like dispatching of troops) for Baekje.
Baekje’s goal, however, to expand its sphere of influence in the direction of the Gaya region was never accomplished, due to a series of failures such as Geumgwan Gaya’s integration into Shilla in 532, Baekje’s defeat at the Gwansan-seong fortress battle in 554, and Shilla’s annexation of Dae-Gaya in 562. The cooperative relationship between Baekje and Wae Japan also deteriorated around mid-6th century, due to changes in East Asian situations and not to mention disturbances in both Baekje and Wae’s political domains.
Naturally, the role of the Japanese-Baekje officials was reduced, and those officials virtually vanished, with the Dalsol(達率) official Illa(日羅) as the last example we could confirm. The emergence and disappearance of this special breed of officials, whose actions were even more special because of the fact that they belonged to both Baekje and Wae at the same time, shows us they were directly responsible for maintaining connection of the two countries, and in the process embodied both sides’ struggle to become an Ancient state and continue a mutually beneficial relationship for that purpose.
At the time, Baekje was trying to expand its territory to cover the Gaya region, and “Wae” Japan was also trying to secure regions that would serve as stable portals through which they could continuously receive advanced culture from the outside. With situations unfolding on each countries showing potentials to not only overlap but also benefit both sides, an era of Baekje-Wae cooperation was formed which gave birth to a new breed of officials who were the aforementioned ‘Japanese-Baekje’ officials. Baekje’s exchanges with Wae became more important than ever during the 550s, as Baekje’s confrontation with Goguryeo and Shilla grew more and more intense. The Japanese-Baekje officials played a crucial role at this juncture, as they were dispatched to Wae and requested Japanese military support (more like dispatching of troops) for Baekje.
Baekje’s goal, however, to expand its sphere of influence in the direction of the Gaya region was never accomplished, due to a series of failures such as Geumgwan Gaya’s integration into Shilla in 532, Baekje’s defeat at the Gwansan-seong fortress battle in 554, and Shilla’s annexation of Dae-Gaya in 562. The cooperative relationship between Baekje and Wae Japan also deteriorated around mid-6th century, due to changes in East Asian situations and not to mention disturbances in both Baekje and Wae’s political domains.
Naturally, the role of the Japanese-Baekje officials was reduced, and those officials virtually vanished, with the Dalsol(達率) official Illa(日羅) as the last example we could confirm. The emergence and disappearance of this special breed of officials, whose actions were even more special because of the fact that they belonged to both Baekje and Wae at the same time, shows us they were directly responsible for maintaining connection of the two countries, and in the process embodied both sides’ struggle to become an Ancient state and continue a mutually beneficial relationship for that purpose.
목차
머리말
1. 왜계백제관인의 출현과 역할
2. 왜계백제관인의 소멸 - 백제와 왜의 관계변화를 중심으로
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일본 속 백제 유물의 범위와 의미
백제문화
2015 .08
-
『任那興亡史』의 논지와 학술적 영향에 대한 비판적 검토
한일관계사연구
2019 .05
-
4~7세기 백제의 경계와 그 변화 -경기와 충청지역을 중심으로-
백제문화
2018 .01
-
任那日本府 연구의 허상과 실상
문물연구
2024 .05
-
후백제 주도 세력의 변화와 그 영향
신라사학보
2021 .04
-
포스터를 통해 바라본 백제문화제 -최근 10여 년을 중심으로-
人文科學硏究
2023 .02
-
중국학계의 백제사 연구 현황과 전망
동북아역사논총
2022 .09
-
640년대 전반 ‘麗濟連和’의 실상과 唐의 백제 인식
사학연구
2021 .03
-
4~6세기 백제에서의 중국계 이주민의 정착과 활동
역사와현실
2020 .09
-
백제 내 이주민 집단의 위상 비교
역사학연구
2017 .01
-
웅진기 백제와 왜국의 교류
한국고대사연구
2024 .09
-
통일에서 분열로 : 후백제의 성립 배경과 관련하여
신라사학보
2018 .04
-
백제의 남방 확장과 가야 접경의 변화
마한백제문화
2021 .12
-
백제의 ‘전북지역’ 진출 과정과 추이 변화
전북사학
2020 .01
-
2018년 경기·호서지역 백제 고고학 연구 성과와 과제
백제학보
2019 .01
-
한성기 백제토기 하한에 대한 비판적 검토
역사학보
2024 .12
-
나제동맹기 신라의 영역확장과 대백제관계
신라사학보
2024 .08
-
백제계 석탑의 특징과 건립배경
江原史學
2015 .01
-
백제 국제관계사 연구동향과 시기구분 시론
백제학보
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0