지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.4
- 수록면
- 169 - 177 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Excessive sugar intake is one of the causes associated with obesity and several chronic diseases prevalent in the modern society. This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of parenting variables based on the theory of planned behavior, on the sweetness preferences and sweets intake of children.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Parents and their children (n = 103, aged 5-7 years) were enrolled to participate in a survey for this study, after providing the required informed consent. Parents were asked to fill out a self-administered questionnaire at their residence. The sweetness preference test for children was conducted at a kindergarten (or daycare center) by applying the one-on-one interview method.
RESULTS: The children were divided into two clusters categorized by the K-mean cluster analysis: Cluster 1 had higher sweetness preference (0.42 M sugar, 35%; 0.61 M sugar, 65%); Cluster 2 exhibited lower sweetness preference (0.14 M sugar, 9.5%; 0.20 M sugar, 9.5%; 0.29 M sugar, 81%). Cluster 1 had a higher frequency of sweets intake (P < 0.01), and lower sweets restriction (P < 0.05) and nutrition quotient score (P < 0.05). Sweets intake was negatively correlated with the nutritional quotient (r = -0.204, P < 0.05). The behavioral intention of parents was higher in cluster 2 (P < 0.05), while affective attitude, feeding practice, and reward were higher in cluster 1 (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively). Furthermore, behavioral intention of parents showed a negative correlation with affective attitude (r = -0.282, P < 0.01) and feeding practice (r = -0.380, P < 0.01), and a positive correlation with subjective norm (r = 0.203, P < 0.05) and parenting attitude (r = 0.433, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the sweetness preferences and sweets intake of children is related to the parent’s affective attitude, feeding practice and reward. We suggest that to reduce the sugar consumption of children, guidelines for access to sweets and pertinent parenting practices are required.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Parents and their children (n = 103, aged 5-7 years) were enrolled to participate in a survey for this study, after providing the required informed consent. Parents were asked to fill out a self-administered questionnaire at their residence. The sweetness preference test for children was conducted at a kindergarten (or daycare center) by applying the one-on-one interview method.
RESULTS: The children were divided into two clusters categorized by the K-mean cluster analysis: Cluster 1 had higher sweetness preference (0.42 M sugar, 35%; 0.61 M sugar, 65%); Cluster 2 exhibited lower sweetness preference (0.14 M sugar, 9.5%; 0.20 M sugar, 9.5%; 0.29 M sugar, 81%). Cluster 1 had a higher frequency of sweets intake (P < 0.01), and lower sweets restriction (P < 0.05) and nutrition quotient score (P < 0.05). Sweets intake was negatively correlated with the nutritional quotient (r = -0.204, P < 0.05). The behavioral intention of parents was higher in cluster 2 (P < 0.05), while affective attitude, feeding practice, and reward were higher in cluster 1 (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively). Furthermore, behavioral intention of parents showed a negative correlation with affective attitude (r = -0.282, P < 0.01) and feeding practice (r = -0.380, P < 0.01), and a positive correlation with subjective norm (r = 0.203, P < 0.05) and parenting attitude (r = 0.433, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the sweetness preferences and sweets intake of children is related to the parent’s affective attitude, feeding practice and reward. We suggest that to reduce the sugar consumption of children, guidelines for access to sweets and pertinent parenting practices are required.
목차
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Exploring parenting variables associated with sweetness preferences and sweets intake of children
Nutrition Research and Practice
2019 .04
-
Comparison of sweetness preference and motivational factors between Korean and Japanese children
Journal of Nutrition and Health
2017 .02
-
Interaction Between Human Sweet Taste Receptor and Sweet-Tasting Protein by Single Molecular Pull-down Assay
한국분석과학회 학술대회
2021 .05
-
Relationship between sweet food intake and stress among college students in Seoul and Gyeonggi areas
Journal of Nutrition and Health
2021 .08
-
고구마 첨가가 우육 햄버거 패티의 품질에 미치는 영향
한국지역사회생활과학회지
2018 .02
-
Perception of sugar reduction, nutrition education, and frequency of snacking in children by the self-perceived sweet dietary habits of mothers in Busan
Nutrition Research and Practice
2016 .10
-
Perception of sugar reduction, nutrition education, and frequency of snacking in children by the self-perceived sweet dietary habits of mothers in Busan
Nutrition Research and Practice
2016 .10
-
단호박가루의 첨가량을 달리한 피낭시에의 품질 특성
동아시아식생활학회지
2020 .12
-
초등학교 고학년 아동의 행복감에 영향을 미치는 부와 모의 양육특성
가정과삶의질연구
2019 .12
-
반응표면분석법을 이용한 자색고구마가루 첨가 타락죽의 제조조건 최적화
동아시아식생활학회지
2024 .06
-
유아기 자녀를 둔 어머니의 양육효능감 관련 변인에 대한 메타회귀분석
한국생활과학회지
2020 .12
-
Childhood Obesity among Socioeconomically Vulnerable Families: A Path Model Using Parenting Behavior and Its Associates
Korean Journal of Health Promotion
2023 .03
-
A meta-regression analysis on the effects of parenting programs for children with disabilities in Korea
한국데이터정보과학회지
2016 .08
-
대구지역 초등학생의 식습관, 단맛 미각 판정 및 당류 급원 식품 섭취 간 상관성 연구
대한지역사회영양학회지
2023 .04
-
청소년의 기질이 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향 : 애정적 양육태도의 매개효과를 중심으로
한국지역사회생활과학회지
2016 .11
-
기혼 직장인의 아동기 학대외상과 양육신념이 양육태도에 미치는 영향
경북간호과학지
2016 .08
-
영아 기질과 어머니 양육스트레스의 관계에서 온정적 양육행동의 조절효과
한국지역사회생활과학회지
2017 .05
-
Do school-based nutrition interventions improve the eating behavior of school-age children?
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .04
-
Do school-based nutrition interventions improve the eating behavior of school-age children?
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-594-000576256