지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 부산대학교 인문학연구소 코기토 코기토 제88호
- 발행연도
- 2019.6
- 수록면
- 157 - 196 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.48115/cogito.2019.06.88.157
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this study, I performed an analysis of John MacIntyre(1837～1905)’s description of Korean grammar in MacIntyre(1879～1881). He focused on ‘T‘o’(토): reading signs added to classical Chinese phrases in their Korean translation, including case particles and conjugation forms in Korean. Observing the usage of ‘T‘o’, he views the Korean language is distinct from the Chinese language because of its own grammatical construction and agglutinative feature. The main contents are as follows.
1. ‘T‘o’ shows the unique feature of Korean language through its role as a syntactical device that marks the case, the mood, the tense, and the relation between phrases and sentences.
2. ‘T‘o’ is a particle to determine the case of noun which has a distinct form and usage for each case: the nominative; the genitive; the accusative; the dative; the ablative case.
3. Particles taken as ‘verbal T‘o’’ are incorporated to the endings of general verbs to express the punctuation and rhythm, mood and tense, interrogation, exclamation and so on.
4. In the Korean language, no morphological distinction for person and number appears but expressions of civility can vary according to the participants’ social position.
5. When it comes to ‘verbal T‘o’’, the morphological distinction for person seems to be divided into three different classes like inferior, equal and superior and each class is equivalent to common and middle, higher form.
6. All the basic forms of Korean verbs end with ‘ㄹ’. But as for conjugation endings, both of root forms as basic forms and abstract forms as variation do exist.
7. The mood of verbs with conjugation is classified into the indicative, the imperative, the infinitive, the conditional, the optative and so forth.
8. The tense of a verb in the indicative would be divided into present, past, future, and the future-perfect.
9. There are direct and indirect quotations as for the narrative form with ‘더’.
Judging from the above, we can understand that MacIntyer made a close description about Korean case particles and verb conjugations as various grammatical forms in Korean language, based on ‘T‘o’ which emerges when Koreans read Chinese phrases. Because of the deeper interpretation of various grammatical forms of Korean language beyond a mere study, the value of MacIntyre(1879～1881) is much appreciated in the history of Korean grammar study.
1. ‘T‘o’ shows the unique feature of Korean language through its role as a syntactical device that marks the case, the mood, the tense, and the relation between phrases and sentences.
2. ‘T‘o’ is a particle to determine the case of noun which has a distinct form and usage for each case: the nominative; the genitive; the accusative; the dative; the ablative case.
3. Particles taken as ‘verbal T‘o’’ are incorporated to the endings of general verbs to express the punctuation and rhythm, mood and tense, interrogation, exclamation and so on.
4. In the Korean language, no morphological distinction for person and number appears but expressions of civility can vary according to the participants’ social position.
5. When it comes to ‘verbal T‘o’’, the morphological distinction for person seems to be divided into three different classes like inferior, equal and superior and each class is equivalent to common and middle, higher form.
6. All the basic forms of Korean verbs end with ‘ㄹ’. But as for conjugation endings, both of root forms as basic forms and abstract forms as variation do exist.
7. The mood of verbs with conjugation is classified into the indicative, the imperative, the infinitive, the conditional, the optative and so forth.
8. The tense of a verb in the indicative would be divided into present, past, future, and the future-perfect.
9. There are direct and indirect quotations as for the narrative form with ‘더’.
Judging from the above, we can understand that MacIntyer made a close description about Korean case particles and verb conjugations as various grammatical forms in Korean language, based on ‘T‘o’ which emerges when Koreans read Chinese phrases. Because of the deeper interpretation of various grammatical forms of Korean language beyond a mere study, the value of MacIntyre(1879～1881) is much appreciated in the history of Korean grammar study.
목차
국문 초록
1. 들어가기
2. 주요 활동과 문헌 해제
3. ‘토’에 기반한 해석
4. 명사와 격 표지
5. 동사와 활용형
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『天理本狂言六義』에 나타나는 추량표현 - 조동사「べし」를 중심으로 -
일본어학연구
2020 .03
-
韓日国際児の日本語の習得過程 -可能表現の活用の誤用を中心に-
일본문화학보
2022 .08
-
어간 모음 변화에 따른 스페인어 동사 변화 규칙
스페인어문학
2019 .01
-
現代日本語における新動詞の形態的変異 ―五段動詞の一段活用形について―
日本學硏究
2018 .01
-
한국어 초급 학습자의 용언 활용 오류 분석 연구
언어와 문화
2020 .01
-
중국 내 출판 한국어 교재의 문법 예문 분석 -불규칙 활용의 문법 항목을 중심으로-
언어와 문화
2024 .02
-
인지언어학을 적용한 스페인어 교육문법: 스페인어 동사 체계 설명 방법을 중심으로
Foreign Languages Education
2022 .02
-
형용사・동사활용형의 명칭 및 제시 범위에 대한 고찰 ─ 2015개정 교육과정 일본어Ⅰ 교과서를 대상으로 ─
日本語敎育
2020 .01
-
현대 러시아어 형태론의 변화 양상 - 활용 체계에서 분석성 -
슬라브硏究
2021 .09
-
17세기 러시아어 동사 체계의 인식과 정립 양상: Грамматıки Славєнскиѧ правилноє Сѵнтаґма(1619)와 Grammatica Russica(1696)를 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2022 .02
-
Chinese EFL Learners’ Overuse of Be: Focusing on Its Formal and Distributional Characteristics
영어영문학21
2017 .01
-
A Cognitive-Semantic Account for the Formation of Two-word and Three-word Verbs
언어학 연구
2015 .04
-
일본어 동사의 문법적 오용분석을 통한 일본어 교육에의 활용방안
일어일문학
2020 .08
-
이중목적어 동사로의 전성
영어영문학21
2015 .01
-
한국어 동사토의 문법 자질과 제약 : ‘미시적’ 설명을 포괄하는 ‘거시적’ 이론 구축을 위한 시론
코기토
2018 .06
-
어근에 기초한 스페인어 동사변화형 학습
스페인어문학
2016 .01
-
계열 관계에 기반한 용언 활용 기술과 규칙성
형태론
2018 .01
-
창발문법에 의한 일본어 동사 이음편의 분석
日本語敎育
2019 .01
-
중국어 상태심리동사의 범위
언어학 연구
2016 .07
-
중세국어 ‘-에/를’ 격 교체 구문에 관한 연구 -처격조사 ‘-에’와 대격조사 ‘-를’의 문법적 기능-
언어와 정보사회
2015 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-001-000897896