메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제20권 제1호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
893 - 927 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study observed on the perspectives on the European Union and the United Kingdom how they prohibit discrimination on grounds of age and atypical workers. Atypical workers including fixed-term employees, part-time workers have been currently suffering from discrimination. In addition, It has become apparent that (quite apart from the human impact upon individual concerned), age discrimination is a source of economic inefficiency. It was necessary to encourage the employment of older people, as well as ensuring that there are no discriminatory barriers in the way of young entrants to the labour market. There isn't always specific objective reason what's so ever that these people need to be treated as less favourable. But there has been historically no legislation in the United Kingdom dealing with age discrimination or atypical workers. Dealing with them inevitably involves a seismic shift in employment practices. As a result, the impetus to grapple with the problems through legislation has come from the European Union. The European Union directives have decided to take one more step further to take part in these cases seriously as relating to the equal treatment of these employees. There are Council Directive 97/81/EC on part-time workers, Council Directive 99/70/EC on fixed-term employees, and Council Directive 2000/78/EC on age discrimination. This study explores the response of British discrimination law to the request of EU Directives in respect of discrimination on grounds of age or atypical work.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0