메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국재산법학회 재산법연구 재산법연구 제27권 제2호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
295 - 322 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The growth of recent entertainment industry is being very quickly, and creating the astronomical wealth. It has positive aspects of industrial growth but also negative aspects with the dispute increased as the scale of profit. So it is necessary to find the rational solution for the dispute. Generally, the best solution for the dispute is the mutual agreement of the parties, and then the parties mutually agreed by the third party, and the last option is that the parties determine through the judge or the dispute settlement procedure. However, in case of such ways impossible, it should be solved by the court process. The last resort to solve entertainment disputes in Korea is mostly made by litigation, and not the other solutions highly considered. Some problems are indicated to solve entertainment disputes through litigation. First, it is indistinct which law theory should be applied as impossible to make the general definition of legal nature of the entertainment contract. Second, it is hard for the entertainer to prove the causal relationship to be the relative weak for the judgment without recognizing the industrial nature of entertainment, and that the solution of decisiveness through the litigation gave the parties no satisfaction. Therefore, the need of finding the solution more reasonably than through litigation has become influential, the solution of disputes presented for such a reason is the alternative dispute settlement system. The arbitration is newly presented solution as it is quick, and economic for the problems such as the delayed solution of disputes, excessive cost, technical intractability of court proceeding indicated as the entertainment litigation problems, and the inappropriateness and expertise of court proceeding for specific disputes, and fit to the specific solution of disputes. The arbitration is characterized by the possibility not to employ the lawyer,reduce the procedure according to the fact finding solved by the mutual agreementof the parties than the law about evidences, exclude the possible court intervention in the dispute resolution process, respect the decision of the parties, make the free dispute solution with minimum solution of disputes, help the trade secret information or the personal secret maintain with a rule to put the privacy in secret. And, it has the merit to be used even in the international entertainment dispute in the future. The reason why the alternative dispute settlement system is recently being gotten more sympathy and continuously discussed on its use even in the Fair Trade Commission is because it is expected to offer the parties more harmonious means. To grope for the new way to solve the dispute means also that our values are being changed. Therefore, some specific way is not fit to all the dispute solutions, but it is right to select the relevant solution according to disputes and parties’ characteristics. When selecting the relevant conflict resolution, it is necessary to consider the relationof parties, financial situation,need for confidentiality, urgency for conflict resolution, etc. Therefore, it is not desirable to depend absolutely upon the discretion of the court though the conflict was occurred, and it is thought more suitable and reasonable for the parties in the entertainment industry to use the alternative dispute settlement system for the specific conflict resolution, the active use of which will be necessary for the entertainment conflict.
#대안적 분쟁해결제도 #중재 #조정 #연예산업 #연예인 #alternative dispute settlement system #arbitration #conciliation #entertainment industry #entertainer

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청
Bingham, Lisa / 1997 / Employment Arbitration : The Repeat Player Effect / Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal 1 google schola Colvin Alex / 2008 / Analyzing Employment Arbitration Outcomes : Using Califomia Data Collection Requirements Dataset / Presented at Research Conference on Access to Civil Justice google schola Dunlop, John T. / 1997 / Mediation and of Employment Disputes / Jossey-Bass Publishers google schola Eisenberg and Hill / 2003 / Employment Arbiration and Litigation : An Empirical Comparison google schola Estreicher, Samule / 2003 / Satums for Rickshaws; The Stakes in the Debate over Predispute Employment Arbitration Agreem / Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 16 (3) google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0