본 연구의 목적은 최근 우리나라 스포츠계 전반에 걸쳐 사회적 문제가 되고 있는 승부조작이 장애인스포츠계에도 영향을 미칠 수 있는 상황이 예상됨에 따라 우리나라 장애인스포츠계에서 승부조작이 발생되는 주요 원인들에는 어떠한 이유가 있는지, 승부조작 과정이 실제 현장에서 어떻게 이루어지고, 어떠한 형태로 나타나는지에 대해 근거이론을 통해 밝히는데 있다. 이와 같은 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 연구의 참여자는 이론적으로 적합한 대상자를 인위적으로 표집하는 이론적 표본추출(theoretical sampling)을 사용하였으며, 본 연구의 주제에 관심이 많고 선수경력 및 지도경력이 7년에서 24년 까지의 국내외 주요대회의 참가 경험이 풍부한 10명을 대상으로 선정하였다. 연구의 문제를 해결하기 위한 구체적인 자료 수집 방법으로 심층면담을 이용하여 자료를 수집하였다. 자료분석은 이론적 민감성을 유지하며 Strauss와 Corbin(1998)이 제시한 근거이론방법의 분석틀에 의거하여 개방코딩, 축코딩, 선택코딩의 절차로 자료를 분석하였다. 이러한 연구과정을 통해 도출된 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 개방코딩 결과 총 48개의 개념이 구성되었고 이를 통해 19개의 하위범주와 11개의 범주가 도출되었다. 축코딩 결과에서는 ‘장애인스포츠의 불균형적 성장’이란 구조적 상황과 ‘승부조작’이라는 핵심 현상, ‘제반환경의 비체계화’라는 맥락적 조건과 ‘제도적 지원’, ‘문제의식 수준’이라는 중재적 조건, ‘대처’라는 작용/상호작용 전략으로 구조화되었으며, 결과적으로 ‘저항’, ‘주도’, ‘관여’, ‘조장’, ‘묵인’과 같이 다양한 승부조작의 형태로 나타난 것으로 정리되었다. 마지막으로 선택코딩 과정에서 가설적 정형화와 가설적 관계진술문을 구성하여 유형분석을 실시한 결과 장애인스포츠 승부조작의 유형은 저항형, 주도형, 조장형, 묵인형으로 상황모형이 도출되었다.
The objective of this study to find the cause of the disability sports match-fixing, meaning that the outcome of the game is pre-determined. This has been a problem not only throughout the sports, but as well as the social problems in Korea. Furthermore, this implication can also target disability sports and therefore, we hope to find main causes why disability sports match-fixings are happening and how they occur and in what forms they take. We hope to find the root of the problem through basic qualitative research. To achieve our goal of the study, we have divided the problems into three details. First, what is the requirement that affects the cause of the disability sports match-fixing. Second, how is disability sports match-fixing develop. Thirdly, what different types of disability sports match-fixing are there and what are the patterns of them. These three problems we will focus on answering, which will define the success of our study and in our study we will use basic qualitative method to analyze the complicated and diverse components of the sports match-fixing in disability sports. The subjects for our study has been selected by identifying who would be theoretically ideal subjects, then by using theoretical sampling we of obtained the list of subjects. This theoretical subjects had to be someone who had 7 to 24years in either home and abroad with plenty of experiences. To solve the problem of sports match-fixing in disability sports, we have collected detailed information, through an in-depth interview with the subjects. It is important to note the importance of theoretical sensitivity the measure offered by Corbin and Strauss(1998) when using the basic qualitative method research. This idea identifies the importance within the data which then gives the significant importance to the one who is researching. Therefore, the researcher must maintain the theoretical sensitivity and base open coding, axial coding and selective coding to basic qualitative research method respectively. The result from the researching through the methods mentioned above is as follows. First, through the use of open coding, total 48concept have been constructed and thru this, 19 subcategories and 11categories have been created. In addition, the axial coding has deduced to a conclusion that in Korea’s disability sports, unbalanced growth within disability sports have given a background for sports match-fixing to happen. This phenomenon of sports match-fixing appears in uneven growth of our disability sports which is a result of unethical management, unfair competing structure in our current sports in Korea. Thereafter, for Korean sportsmen to engaged in disability sports match-fixing, to accept or deny the request depend on lack of manpower, poor training facilities, lack of professionalism, lack of communication and understanding the ethical behavior within sports community can affect the involvement of the disability sports match-fixing. These problems within the sports communities have consequently have evolved in to ‘Resist, Lead, Involvement, Promote and Condoning. Lastly, through the selective coding, hypothetical fixed form and hypothetical relational statement have been classified and patterns were analyzed. This method has made it possible for our research to classify the types of disability sports match-fixing. These classification are; resisting type, leading type, involvement type, promoting type and lastly condoning type. So far, our study has proven that disability sports match-fixing is created with external and internal factors of sports and derive into various types of disability sport match-fixing. This study has used basic qualitative research method to explore the steps, causes and forms of the disability sports match-fixing. This study has limitations to apply it to all the phenomena of disability sports match-fixing, however we were able to understand the environment and structures of the disability sports match-fixing through members of the para sports and their experiences.