메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
불교학연구회 불교학연구 불교학연구 제19권
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
259 - 290 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Even though several scholars had tried to reveal parts related to practices in the Doctrines of San-lun School (Chi-tsang), it seems that such efforts have failed. That’s because it is believed that no other evidence has, yet, been presented, regardless of their frequent strong arguments that the Doctrines of San-lun School had been centered upon only theories in many theses or books. At first, in my research, I have tried to analyze existing researches one by one and finally found the reasons that it was useless or unsuccessful to find out some parts related to practical method in the Doctrines of San-lun School throughout former efforts. Next, I have presented realistic records that show figures of Chitsang as dhyāna’s practitioner, revealed that he didn’t exclude selection. Next, I have taken into consideration of the reasons that he had not presented any special dhyāna’s practical method, and he had developed insight’ method particularly in his writings. These considerations have been made focusing upon importance of meaning of insight out of Buddhistic practices. Finally, I have, through the four ways to have an insight into languages (sūtra), fit a system of practices of the Doctrines of San-lun School into a framework of a system of universal practical method of Buddhism. I have come to an idea of “This very Languages itself are Emancipation” which is a unique practice’s theory of the Doctrines of San-lun School.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (39)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0