메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
병원간호사회 임상간호연구 임상간호연구 제13권 제2호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
169 - 177 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: This study was to compare the effects of 2% lidocaine intradermal injection and 10% lidocaine spray for pain and anxiety relief on the arteriovenous fistula puncture. Methods: The subjects were 34 patients who were getting hemodialysis 3 times a week. The intradermal 2% lidocaine on the arteriovenous fistula puncture was injected to all subjects for the first 1 week and 10% lidocaine was sprayed for the following 1 week. The anxiety was measured using visual analogue scale (VAS), blood pressure and pulse. The pain was measured using VAS and non-verbal pain behavior scale. Results: The VAS anxiety scores, blood pressure, and pulse rate were not significantly different in two methods. In the VAS pain and non- verbal pain scores, 2% lidocaine intradermal injection caused significantly lower pain than 10% lidocaine spray. Conclusion: 10% lidocaine spray compared with 2% lidocaine intradermal injection is less effective for reducing pain and anxiety on arteriovenous fistula puncture. However, 35.3% of the subjects showed satisfactory response to 10% lidocaine spray method, and 58.8% of them were willing to use it again. Therefore, the further study on lidocaine amount and optimum time for needle puncture after spray method is required.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0