메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경쟁법학회 경쟁법연구 경쟁법연구 제37권
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
32 - 58 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article considers the ongoing debate over the role of competition law and constitutional law as well in protection of medium/small businesses in Korea. Recently the associations of medium/small firms have strongly argued that the Korean competition law should do something to protect medium/small businesses from big firms, and also the government should prohibit big firms from doing their businesses in the markets which are deemed suitable for medium/small firms. These arguments assume that bigness is evil, and smallness itself deserves special protection by the economic democracy clause in the Korean Constitution. Of course medium/small firms may pursue their own interests. However they do not have the right to sacrifice consumers and other firms’ welfare. Considering political influences of the associations of medium/small firms, politicians actually prepared the bills to protect them from the competition with big firms. However it should be noted that the purpose of the competition law is not to protect medium and small firms. Indeed the Korean competition law do not distinguish between medium/small firms and big firms. There is little doubt that the legislations designed to restraint competition among big firms and medium/small firms would impair big firms’ fundamental right to do business, distort market functions, and also reduce consumer welfare. Politicians must realize that ‘market competition’ itself has constitutional value, and economic democracy is nothing more than free market based on liberty democracy under the Constitution.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0