메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 고려법학 제48호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
203 - 237 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
When a kosdaq listed company will merge with an unlisted corporation, the Korea Exchange (the exchange) askes the unlisted corporation to satisfy requriements which is described in kosdaq market listing regulation §19(1)2 based on the securities and exchange act(the Act). It is the problem whether the above listing regulation has the effect as legal norm, or stipulation(having the effect of contract). In my opinion, it shall be construded that the rightful body making legal norm under korean constitutional system is restricted only to the body expressly described in the constitution as the subject of enacting legal norm. The exchange doesn't applied to the above rightful body of enacting legal norm. Therefore the above listing regulation cannot be the legal norm, but fall under stipulation of the law relating to regulating of the stipulation(the stipulation law). The above listing regulation was enacted in exceeding the limitation of the enacting purpose and empowering range of the presidential decree of the Act §84-7(3)2, so it is very unresonable to listed-company as customer of the exchange, therefore construded as invalid clause against the stipulation law §6(1)1. Besides, in case that although non listed-company in kosdaq market to intend to merge with listed-company doesn't satisfy merger requirements of listing regulation, these companys are merged, the exchange makes decision of delisting of the listed-company according to the listing regulation §38(1)17. The legal nature of the delisting decision is construded as exercising of the right of terminating of the listing contract by the Supreme Court. The above exercising of the right under listing regulation §19(1)2 and §38(1)17 is very unequal, and the exchange is endowed with the right of the terminating contract which is not described by the law. So, the above listing regulation §19(1)2 is also concluded as invalid against the stipulation law §9(2).

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0