메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 고려법학 제55호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
267 - 297 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
German Civil Procedure Act implemented a set of reform statutes aimed at electronic documents court filing in 2005. It permits to file all court documents by electronic means. Documents for service to the other party is not needed by filing electronic documents. The courts will print out the e-filed documents at their own cost. Judgements and all other court documents are able to be produced by electronic documents on which there have to be electronic signatures. Cases are to be managed by electronic documents or paper documents. Electronic documents are to be printed out for paper case management, and paper documents are to be scanned for e-filing, but the original electronic or paper documents have to be preserved by courts until conclusive end of the litigations. Electronic documents are not treated as documentary evidence but demonstrative evidence. However their authentication is determined like documentary evidence. Certified electronic signatures give conclusive forces by proving formal authentication of electronic documents, like signatures on paper documents. Case record is able to be preserved by electronic means and be accessed by parties and their lawyers. The parties are able to get their court record by electronic means, e.g. e-mail, the lawyers are able to get direct access to the record. Service of court documents is able to be done by e-mail to the lawyers, or pro se litigents who consent the service sending by electronic means. If the person received the service by electronic means, he or she have to reply it. Implementing e-filing system into Korean Civil Procedure, the German statutes on e-filing would be good references, but it does not have to be overlooked that German Civil Procedure has compulsory lawyer representation system only except for “Amtsgericht.”

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0