메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이화여자대학교 법학연구소 법학논집 법학논집 제11권 제1호
발행연도
2006.1
수록면
75 - 98 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Criminal Procedure Act(hereinafter “CPA”) has been amended 14 times from its enactment to the present. In this article I will comment the initial act and chief amendments of CPA, which are the first, third, fifth, sixth and eighth revision. Our Legislators introduced followings into CPA: ⑴ A public prosecutor instructs judicial police officers and assistants in the investigation of crimes(§195, §196). ⑵ Public prosecution by state(§246) and discretionary indictment(§247①). ⑶ Being committed to a court for trial for an application for complaint by high court(§260~§262). ⑷ Detention and notice of cause(§72) and notice of detention to defendant’s defense counsel(§87). ⑸ Review of legality of detention by a court(§201). ⑹ Changes in indictment by the public prosecutor(§298). ⑺ Examine defendant, witness and evidence by the presiding judge(§287, §162, §292). ⑻ Exclusion of confession caused by duress etc.(§309) and rule of corroborating evidence of confession(§310). ⑼ Discrimination in probative value of evidence between protocol prepared by public prosecutor and that prepared by judicial police officer(§312). The first amendment of CPA(1961.9.1. Act No. 705) contained as follows: ⑴ Introduction of cross examination(§161–2) and alteration of method of examining defendant(§287). ⑵ Declaration of hear say rule(§310–2). ⑶ Introduction of evidence by which probative value of testimony may be argued(§318–2). ⑷ Alteration of appeal system such as jurisdiction of appeal court(§357, §371), structure of appeal instance, listing of reasons for appeal(§364①, §361–5). The third amendment of CPA(1973.1.25. Act No. 2450) resulted in follows: ⑴ Abolition of review of detention legality(§201). ⑵ Broadening of emergency detention and softening of prohibition of re–detention(§206). ⑶ Introduction of interrogation of witness(§221–2). ⑷ Adoption of summary trial procedures(§286–2). ⑸ Limitation of offences which can be committed to a court for trial for an application for complaint by high court(§260). The fifth amendment(1980.12.18. Act No. 3282) revived limitedly review of legality of detention by a court(§214–2①) and introduced presumption of innocence(§275–2). The sixth amendment(1987.11.28. Act No. 3955) expanded review of legality of detention by a court(§214–2①) and stipulated newly right of victim to state(§294–2). The most significant amendment in these days was occurred in 1995.12.29.(Act No. 5054). The important contents of that are as follows: ⑴ Introduction of arrest of suspect(§200–2). ⑵ Introduction of examination of suspect before issuing warrant of detention(§201–2). ⑶ Adoption of the release of the detained suspect under the condition of payment of bail money to guarantee appearance(§214–2④).

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0