메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제34권 제4호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
275 - 291 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A system-approach to the law is essential to understand and make a theory on it. We can divide theories or models of the legal system into formal ones and substantial ones. The formal theories of legal system focus on the membership of a norm to a legal system and the modes of inter-relation between formally different modes of legal norms, namely, command, prohibition, permission, empowerment, etc. In contrast with them, substantial theories of legal system place stress on the substantial, not formal, interaction between legal norms. The analytical, normative positivists'(including Kelsen, Hart, and Raz) legal theories can be seen as the formal models of the legal system. On the other hand, the non-positivists' theory based on the legal rule/principle distinction is a substantial theory of the legal system. Alexy and Dworkin are representatives of this position. However, a positivist can also accept the rule/principle distinction and make a sustantial model of the legal system, if he or she is not an exclusive legal positivist who claims that a moral ideal or value cannot be a legal norm even if it has a social source as an enactment, a precedent, or a custom. And the exclusive positivism should be objected, because they ask too much certainty on the law while exaggerating the uncertainty of moral reasoning, and cannot explain appropriately the multi-layered legal system. Each of the approaches-formal and substantial- to the legal system gives attention to the different aspects of it, and are complementary to each other.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0