메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제26권 제4호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
447 - 470 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Justice Ministry has announced to enact an amendment of criminal law to reintroduce protective supervision on October 25, 2010. The protective supervision was introduced in 1980 and abandoned in 2005 as the Society Protection Law was revoked. After 5 years since the revocation,the protective supervision is facing reintroduction to criminal law. The reason for re-adopting the protective supervision is that the protective supervision is an alternative to efficiently manage violent and habitual criminals. The amendment of criminal law has adopted new policies to resolve problems that previous protective supervision had to justify its reintroduction. Nonetheless, there are some doubts on the necessity and justification of adopting the protective supervision. Especially, the National Assembly has amended some provisions of criminal law to increase the maximum sentence from 15 years to 30 years, and up to 50 years for additional violation on April 15, 2010. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the necessity of reintroducing the protective supervision. This study has reviewed the necessity of the protective supervision that is more likely to be adopted. Moreover, this study has proposed the injustice of reintroducing the protective supervision after carefully examining the amended provisions. On the other hand, this study has further proposed an appropriate revision of the provisions if it is inevitable to reintroduce the protective supervision.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0