메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제24권 제3호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
143 - 192 (50page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As electronic and digital trends were emphasized in a world-wide scale, the notion of ‘E-government’ appeared and has been developed. Korea has made steady efforts for the reform to ‘E-government’, too. As the world gets more electronized and digitalized, many governments have tried reformation in governmental area to the ‘E-Government’ and Korea is taking leading position in that reform. But, generally speaking, ‘E-Government’ policies in Korea have inattentively dealt with basic human rights of Korean people such as right of privacy by having excessively clung to the economic ideal of ‘administrative efficiency.’ With the remarkable development of IT and the enlargement of its basic equipment, we are interested in Information increasingly. Recently, there has been in Korea a discussion on the establishment of a body on the protection of student information. From this critical point of view, this study starts with surveying the definition of ‘Student Information’ and ‘Education Information. The protection of student information is still governed by general laws related to the protection of personal information. Student information needs to be protected in a manner different from personal information through enacting a separate law, which would specify the disclosure and protection of student information and the rights of parents. It should be determined in view of the need of education rather than personal rights whether the National Education Information System (NEIS) must include educational information or not. I believe the problem of infringement on personal rights which might arise in the course of using educational information should be solved through authorization and security technology adopted by the NEIS as well as the enactment of a new law. These kind of NEIS' data is based on the basic rights of ‘self-data decision’ and ‘self-data control’ which are layed on our constitutional law. Hence the director and teachers in a school should obey the rule which they have to obtain students' parents' consent to collect personal data, to accumulate those data and profiles as the sharing database, and to use the personal information and to dissolve those data. So School masters have to permit to access to their children and to offer their children educational personal data. But we have to make face with any legal resource and are going to search for the standard of data protection guideline of OECD and EU following as: these rule are ‘limit of collection data’, ‘principle of data contents’, ‘principle of object distinct’, ‘principle of limit of use to personal data’, ‘principle of safe protection policy’, ‘principle of openness’, ‘principle to participate’ and ‘principle of responsibility.’ I think that this type of enactment in Korea gives us considerable suggestions in many respects

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (46)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0