메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 외국학연구소 외국학연구 외국학연구 제44호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
11 - 40 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study investigated the difficulty level of vocabulary on the Civil Service English Exam (CSEE) conducted between the years 2012 to 2017 through corpus analysis. The CSEE was categorized into six groups depending on its employment levels of Grade 7 (G7) and Grade 9 (G9), and government levels of national, local, and Seoul. The analysis tools utilized in this research included the following: 1) WordSmith Tools 6.0; 2) Range program; and 3) Readability calculator. One notable finding was that the Standardized Type/Token Ratio (STTR) of G9 for Seoul was the highest among the six CSEEs at 53.26, and the STTR of G9 (51.24) was higher than that of G7 (49.30). The result that the difficulty level of G9 vocabulary was higher than that of G7 vocabulary was verified by the low level of General Service List (GSL) & Academic Word List (AWL) range and the result of readability analysis. However, this cannot be considered reasonable, considering the fact that the employment level of G7 is higher than that of G9. The high difficulty level of vocabulary for G9 seemed to be affected by the number of applicants, which was more than five times that of G7. In order to increase the quality of the CSEE, this study suggests that the test developers should put forth more effort to evaluate applicants’ language competence at both the organizational and pragmatic levels in a more comprehensive way, rather than increasing the difficulty level of vocabulary.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0