메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: To analyze the results of urine cultures and antimicrobial sensitivity tests according to the voiding methods in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) over a 15-year period.Materials and Methods: A total of 1,579 urine culture samples, obtained from January 2000 to December 2014, for 73 SCI patients were analyzed according to the voiding method. We analyzed the following: positive urine culture rate, colony counts, isolated number of organism, major organisms, and antimicrobial sensitivity tests. The voiding methods were categorized into four methods: clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), suprapubic catheterization (SPC), urethral Foley catheter, and spontaneous voiding (SV).Results: Among the 1,579 urine samples, 1,250 (79.2%) were positive. The CIC group showed the lowest rate of bacteriuria (p<0.001), colony counts (p<0.001), and polymicrobial infection (p<0.001). Causative organisms were mostly gram-negative bacteria (86.7%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.7%) was most common pathogen followed by Escherichia coli (22.3%), Klebsiella species (9.5%), Providencia species (4.4%), and Serratia marcescens (4.2%). Major pathogens and antimicrobial sensitivity tests were different according to the voiding method.Conclusions: CIC is the best voiding method to reduce urinary tract infection (UTI) in SCI patients. To treat UTI in in SCI patients, empirical antibiotics can be chosen according to the voiding method based on the reference of our study prior to the availability of antimicrobial sensitivity results.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0