지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are two views on fragments. On view argues that certain fragments can be derived by ellipsis (Merchant 2004, 2007). The other view opposes this view and argues that fragments are generated as such and by themselves can be interpreted as propositions, assertions and questions (cf. Barton 1990, Stainton 1993, 1994, 1997, 2006). Discussing some fragments in Korean, this paper provides novel arguments in favor of the former. More specifically, this paper examines fragments in Korean, dubbed Pseudogapping, Pseudostripping, and Stripping (Kim 1997), and argues that these constructions are derived by ellipsis.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
Barton,Ellen / 1990 / Nonsentential constituents / John Benjamins
Bo?kovi?,?eljko / 1994 / D-structure, theta-criterion, and movement into theta positions / Linguistic Analysis 24 : 247 ~ 286
Chomsky, Noam / 1993 / The theory of principles and parameters. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Vennemann, eds., Syntax: An international handbook of
Hankamer, Jorge / 1976 / Deep and surface anaphora / Linguistic Inquiry 7 (3) : 391 ~ 428
Hankamer, Jorge / 1979 / Deletion coordinate structures. Garland: New York. (Ph.D. thesis, Yale University 1971)
Bo?kovi?,?eljko / 1994 / D-structure, theta-criterion, and movement into theta positions / Linguistic Analysis 24 : 247 ~ 286
Chomsky, Noam / 1993 / The theory of principles and parameters. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Vennemann, eds., Syntax: An international handbook of
Hankamer, Jorge / 1976 / Deep and surface anaphora / Linguistic Inquiry 7 (3) : 391 ~ 428
Hankamer, Jorge / 1979 / Deletion coordinate structures. Garland: New York. (Ph.D. thesis, Yale University 1971)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국어 조각구에 관한 분석
언어학 연구
2016 .04
-
Polarity Mismatches in Korean Fragments
생성문법연구
2013 .01
-
Some Notes on Two Types of Fragments in English
영어학
2012 .12
-
Notes on Fragments in English & Korean*1
영어학
2009 .06
-
Case and Postposition Stranding in Multiple Fragments : Why is the Final Fragment (not) Special?
어학연구
2015 .12
-
관용표현이 조각문에 관해 말해주는 것
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
On Form-function Mismatch Puzzles in Fragments : An Ellipsis Approach
담화와인지
2006 .04
-
Notes on Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments: A Reply to Chung (2019)
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
Fragments of Self-Pronouns in English: A Direct Generation Analysis
영어학연구
2018 .01
-
Markers, Index, and Multiple Fragment Answers in Korean
생성문법연구
2014 .01
-
Some Notes on Ahn and Cho‘s (2017a, b, c) Approach to Fragment Answers in Korean
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
Three Types of Fragment
생성문법연구
2014 .01
-
Notes on Fragments with Tag Questions in English and Korean
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
On Caseless Fragments and Some Implications
어학연구
2017 .08
-
Some Restrictions on Multiple Remnants in Right Dislocation and Fragments
언어
2020 .03
-
Left Branch Extraction in Fragment and Truncated Cleft Constructions of Korean
생성문법연구
2012 .01
-
Fragments in Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
Idiomatic Fragment Answers in Negation
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
Base-generated Approach to Why-Stripping in English
언어
2014 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0