메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생성문법학회 생성문법연구 생성문법연구 제25권 제1호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
181 - 216 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, I discuss the following two semantic properties of interrogatives with NEG in Korean (and in English): First, they are interpreted either as (I) neutral negative interrogatives or as (II) non-neutral interrogatives where the negative meaning of NEG is considered to be lost. Second, type (II) non-neutral interrogatives can trigger either a question or a statement reading. By examininglexical/semantic properties of sentence-ending (SE) markers in Korean, which can be analyzed as MOOD (or as MOOD+COMP), I suggest that the loss of the negative meaning of NEG is triggered because some of the SE markers that are known as interrogative (INT) markers optionally bear the feature [Speaker's Denial] (=[Ds]), whose function is to deny the negative value of NEG in a way similar to how a NEG negates the negative value of another NEG in a sentence. By suggesting that SE markers that can have the feature [Ds] may be ambiguous between DEC and INT in a certain way, I attempt to explain the second semantic property. During the discussion, I suggest that some SE markers are many-way ambiguous and that there are at least three subclasses of interrogatives/declaratives: (neutral) negative interrogatives/declaratives (I), (non-neutral) interrogatives/declaratives with Speaker's Denial (II), and (non-neutral) interrogatives/declarative with Speaker's Assertion (III). Finally, I discuss empirical advantages of the present approach, and also examine some related issues discussed in the literature, which are properly explained under the present approach.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0