메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한중국학회 중국학 중국학 제50호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
177 - 193 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this research is to analyze the difference between meaning and function of the two psychological verbs ‘想(xiang)’ and ‘要(yao)’ meaning ‘hope.’ ‘想’ and ‘要’ are the two widely used words meaning ‘hope’ and are the most commonly used vocabularies. These two words can be interchanged when used to mean ‘hope’ but sometimes it is impossible to replace one another. Therefore, if both ‘想’ and ‘要’ have the meaning of ‘hope’ as their meaning and the purpose vary. This research tries to examine the meaning and use of ‘想’ and ‘要.’The method of analyzing the difference between meaning and the role of the two psychological verbs meaning ‘hope’, ‘想’ and ‘要’ is done in the following ways; Firstly, this research looks into the definition of the words ‘想’ and ‘要’ and analyzes the semantic feature of them. Through this examination it was identified that ‘想’ has meaning of ‘hope’ but ‘要’ has features of ‘hope’ as well as ‘willingness’ and ‘duty/responsibility.’ Secondly, based on the fact that common semantic feature of ‘想’ and ‘要’ is ‘hope’ but ‘要’ has ‘willingness’ and ‘duty/responsibility’ along with ‘hope.’ As a result, this study analyzes their functional difference in terms of restriction of the subject, subject person, and object.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0