메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국과학사학회 한국과학사학회지 한국과학사학회지 제39권 제3호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
405 - 434 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Throughout its history Joseon accepted the calendrical method of China and used calendars based on it. Yet, Joseon did not simply use the calendars pronounced and printed in China, or reprint them in Korea. Joseon government carried out its own calendrical calculations and printed and distributed calendars that were prepared using such calculations. Of course Joseon did not adopt a calendrical method different from that of China: the calendrical work of Joseon calendar specialists stayed within the Chinese calendrical method. Nevertheless, the calendars printed and distributed by the Joseon government were different from the calendars pronounced by Chinese emperors. What were the actual differences between the Joseon and the Chinese calendars? What and how did the Joseon government calculate for their calendars? What was their aim in carrying out such calculations? With these questions in mind, this paper examines the Joseon government’s work of calendrical calculation and publication in the late Joseon period. I will argue that the real purpose of their work was to achieve a calendar that meets the standard of the Chinese calendar, rather than to have ‘our own calendar’ as has often been suggested.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (55)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0