지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.1
- 수록면
- 269 - 277 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective : The objective of this study was to examine how experts and the public perceived various environmental
and technological hazards based on psychometric paradigm.
Methods : We conducted a survey that included 30 hazards and 10 risk attributes. Subjects of this study were 214 people
with three groups; (1) experts (55 people), (2) graduates( 78 people), (3) under graduates (81 people). Factor analysis
was used to confirm the common risk attribute from 8 risk attributes. Also, multiple regression analysis was used to
identify factors influencing on perceived risk and benefit of hazards.
Results : This study revealed that experts tend to be more tolerant than graduates and under graduate students for the
30 hazards. Using factor analysis, two main factors were identified: factor 1, commonly called “Dread Risk”, and factors
2, commonly called, “Unknown Risk” in the literature. We identified that environmental hormone concentration and
global warming ranked high in both dread risk and unknown risk. Multiple regression models were used to test the association
of perceived social risk and perceived social benefit with two main factors. Dread risk had significant explanatory
power on perceived social risk and benefit. We identified that the experts were less likely to perceived dread risk
and know more information about the hazards.
Conclusions : There were differences of risk perception between experts and lay people. Especially, experts' perception
of risk was commonly lower than other people's perception.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
Barnett, J. / 2001 / Risk perception and experience: Hazard personality profiles and individual differences / Risk Analysis 21 (1) : 171 ~ 177
Bronfma n, N. C. / 2003 / Risk perception in a developing country: The case of Chile / Risk Analysis 23 (6) : 1271 ~ 1285
Cha, Y.-J / 2000 / Risk perception in Korea: A comparison with Japan and the United States / Journal of Risk Research 3 (4) : 321 ~ 332
Cha, Y.-J / 2000 / Risk perception in Korea: An application of psychometric paradigm / International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 1 (1) : 42 ~ 45
Fischhoff, B. / 1978 / How safe is safe enough? a psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefit / Policy Science 9 : 127 ~ 152
Bronfma n, N. C. / 2003 / Risk perception in a developing country: The case of Chile / Risk Analysis 23 (6) : 1271 ~ 1285
Cha, Y.-J / 2000 / Risk perception in Korea: A comparison with Japan and the United States / Journal of Risk Research 3 (4) : 321 ~ 332
Cha, Y.-J / 2000 / Risk perception in Korea: An application of psychometric paradigm / International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 1 (1) : 42 ~ 45
Fischhoff, B. / 1978 / How safe is safe enough? a psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefit / Policy Science 9 : 127 ~ 152
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
공단 지역주민과 근로자의 환경위해도 인식과 인지된 편익
Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
2005 .06
-
Risk management and communication with the public in Japan : Social application of risk analysis
환경독성보건학회 심포지엄 및 학술대회
2007 .11
-
위해인지도 맵을 이용한 나노기술 리스크 커뮤니케이션 연구
Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
2010 .09
-
환경문제의 위해도 인식과 위해도 홍보 프로그램의 효과분석-라돈과 다이옥신을 중심으로-
Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
2002 .12
-
Comprehensive Examination of Heavy Metal Risk Perception : Focusing on Affect, Trust, and Health Literacy
보건학논집
2016 .09
-
환경문제에 대한 일반대중과 전문가의 위해도 인식 관련 요인 ( Related Factors of Environmental Risk Perception among General Public and Experts )
Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
2001 .06
-
Psychological Impact of Health Risk Appraisal of Korean Women at Different Levels of Breast Cancer Risk: Neglected Aspect of the Web-based Cancer Risk Assessment Tool
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2012 .01
-
Biomedical Laboratory
대한의생명과학회지
2017 .09
-
일반인과 전문가의 환경문제에 대한 위해도 인식 차이 ( A Comparison of Environmental Risk Perceptions between General Public and Experts )
Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
2001 .06
-
Perceptions of Cancer Risk and Cause of Cancer Risk in Korean Adults
Cancer Research and Treatment
2015 .01
-
Risk for pain
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2015 .11
-
Monte-Carlo 모의실험을 통한 부분 인구집단별 이산화질소와 오존의 노출 및 위해성 평가
한국환경보건학회지
2019 .01
-
Risk for infection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2015 .11
-
Social surveys on the Japanese perception of risks in energy related activities : Japanese citizens’recognition patterns on risks and benefits
환경독성보건학회 심포지엄 및 학술대회
2004 .11
-
방문간호를 받는 재가노인의 낙상위험
근관절건강학회지
2014 .04
-
Risk and culture: variations in dioxin risk perceptions, behavioral preferences among social groups in South Korea
Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
2014 .12
-
Occupational health hazards in a prosthodontic practice: review of risk factors and management strategies
The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics
2012 .01
-
Impact of Perceived Cancer Risk on the Cancer Screening Rate in the General Korean Population: Results from the Korean Health Panel Survey Data
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2014 .01
-
Preventive and Risk Reduction Strategies for Women at High Risk of Developing Breast Cancer: a Review
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0