메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국임상약학회 한국임상약학회지 한국임상약학회지 제27권 제2호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
69 - 76 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: This study was conducted to assess the current status of experiential education, by analyzing pharmacy students’satisfaction and evaluation for practice sites and preceptors for 3 years from 2014 through 2016. Methods: Students evaluated thepractice sites and preceptors using a 5-point and a 4-point Likert scale, respectively. Analysis was performed based on the typesof curriculums and practice sites. In addition, sub-analysis was conducted based on the types of health-system pharmacy and thecommunity pharmacy. Results: Total 203 students responded to the survey questionnaires. The 3-year average score of students’satisfaction with practice sites was 4.25. In the sub-analysis conducted based on the types of health-system pharmacy, the scorewas higher in the tertiary hospital pharmacies than that of the general hospital pharmacies (4.49 vs. 4.06, P<0.001). For communitypharmacy, the difference in the score of the 3-year analysis was not significant, depending on the types (4.51 vs. 4.33, P=0.054). The average score of students’ evaluation on the preceptors was 3.37 in the 3-year analysis. The score was significantly higher forthe preceptors of tertiary hospital pharmacies than those of general hospital pharmacies (3.61 vs. 3.25, P<0.001). For communitypharmacy, no significant differences were found, depending on the types of pharmacy (3.53 vs. 3.43, P=0.309). Conclusion: Thestudents' satisfaction with practice sites and preceptors in pharmacy experiential education was high. However, it varied greatlydepending on the types of educational institutions. Mutual effort between university and educational institutions is required, tonarrow the gap in the degree of students’ satisfaction.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0