지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.9
- 수록면
- 197 - 225 (29page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2019.9.83.197
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Bingdian(Freezing point in Chinese), a weekly supplement magazine to China Youth Daily in the People"s Republic of China, was temporarily shut down by officials 24 January 2006, but was allowed to reopen in March that year. The scandal over Bingdian was originated from an article, modernization and history textbook in it by philosophy professor Yuanweishi of Zhongshan University.
The article dissented from the official view of the second Opium war and the Yihetuan(the Boxer Rebellion). He challenged the textbooks for portraying the 1900 Boxer Rebellion as a magnificent feat of patriotism without describing the violence committed by the rebels or their extreme anti-foreign views. He also criticized the books for blaming the second Opium War of the mid-1800s entirely on foreign nations, without mentioning the Qing government"s record of violating treaties by refusing foreign merchants access to Chinese cities. He wrote the article in the name of “telling true history to the youth”.
The Chinese government has suspended Bingdian and outspoken newspaper sections, accusing its editors of viciously attacking the socialist system. The decision to stop Bingdian was made by the Publicity Department of the Central Committee of the China Communist Party. The Publicity Department was formerly the Propaganda Bureau, and is responsible for supervision of all news and publication activities in China.
Great controversy about the article broke out in China. Many critical readers, netizens and intellectuals were mostly supportive Yuanweishi and criticized Publicity Department of Central Committee, asking for the liberty of the press. In addition, many foreign press reported the suspending of Bingdian. Public opinion of in and out made Bingdian recover by the Chinese government reluctantly on the condition that there should be an article criticizing the Yuanweishi’s article by Zhanghaipeng.
This scandal symbolically shows that there would be political oppression in case of different interpretation of history from Chinese Communist Party. There is the possibility of the second or the third Bingdian scandal in China.
The article dissented from the official view of the second Opium war and the Yihetuan(the Boxer Rebellion). He challenged the textbooks for portraying the 1900 Boxer Rebellion as a magnificent feat of patriotism without describing the violence committed by the rebels or their extreme anti-foreign views. He also criticized the books for blaming the second Opium War of the mid-1800s entirely on foreign nations, without mentioning the Qing government"s record of violating treaties by refusing foreign merchants access to Chinese cities. He wrote the article in the name of “telling true history to the youth”.
The Chinese government has suspended Bingdian and outspoken newspaper sections, accusing its editors of viciously attacking the socialist system. The decision to stop Bingdian was made by the Publicity Department of the Central Committee of the China Communist Party. The Publicity Department was formerly the Propaganda Bureau, and is responsible for supervision of all news and publication activities in China.
Great controversy about the article broke out in China. Many critical readers, netizens and intellectuals were mostly supportive Yuanweishi and criticized Publicity Department of Central Committee, asking for the liberty of the press. In addition, many foreign press reported the suspending of Bingdian. Public opinion of in and out made Bingdian recover by the Chinese government reluctantly on the condition that there should be an article criticizing the Yuanweishi’s article by Zhanghaipeng.
This scandal symbolically shows that there would be political oppression in case of different interpretation of history from Chinese Communist Party. There is the possibility of the second or the third Bingdian scandal in China.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 袁偉時의 「현대화와 역사교과서」
Ⅲ. 『빙점』의 정간 조치를 둘러싼 갈등
Ⅳ. 『빙점』의 복간과 남겨진 불씨
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
인간 없는 전쟁
타우마제인
2024 .01
-
전쟁을 다시 생각한다
철학과 현실
2022 .06
-
전쟁 비판학
현대사상
2020 .07
-
[일반] 기독교와 전쟁 : 정의로운 전쟁(정당 전쟁, Just War)에서 정의로운 평화(Just Peace)로
성서마당
2022 .12
-
전쟁을 보는 여자의 눈
인물과사상
2016 .02
-
헤게모니 이행기와 전쟁 −전쟁의 원인, 경제와 전쟁의 순환구조 그리고 미중대결−
현대사상
2020 .07
-
4차 산업혁명 이후의 전쟁
현대사상
2020 .07
-
[서평] 《전쟁과 평화: 6.25 전쟁과 정전체제의 탄생》를 읽고 : 《전쟁과 평화: 6.25 전쟁과 정전체제의 탄생》를 읽고
현대사광장
2016 .07
-
새로운 전쟁의 “전쟁경제”: 세 차례의 아프가니스탄 전쟁
군사연구
2020 .01
-
러시아-우크라이나 전쟁은 일어나지 않았는가?: 전쟁 영상의 과잉과 현실의 문제
문명과 경계
2022 .09
-
전쟁과 테러 외 1편
자음과모음
2021 .03
-
‘조선전쟁’의 기억과 마이너리티 연대의 (불)가능성 사키 류조의 「기적의 시」(1967)를 중심으로
비교한국학
2021 .01
-
잡지 『신천지』를 통해서 본 ‘전후인식’ 양상
세계문학비교연구
2016 .01
-
그림책에 나타난 어린이의 전쟁 경험 비교 연구
아동청소년문학연구
2019 .12
-
우크라이나 전쟁에서 무엇을 배워야 하는가?
철학과 현실
2022 .06
-
우크라이나 전쟁을 통해 우리가 알게 되는 것들
황해문화
2022 .12
-
우크라이나 전쟁이 드러내고 보여주는 것들
씨알의소리
2024 .11
-
《전쟁과 평화 : 6.25전쟁과 정전체제의 탄생》 (서강대학교출판부, 2015) : 6.25전쟁 이후의 정전체제는 어떻게 만들어졌을까?
현대사광장
2016 .07
-
근대 동아시아 정보전쟁과 암호 해독 : 청일전쟁과 러일전쟁을 중심으로
동북아역사포커스
2024 .09
-
한국전쟁기 서울의 학생과 학교
[TCHCCOS] 서울과 역사
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-912-001237469