지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第150輯
- 발행연도
- 2020.3
- 수록면
- 339 - 375 (37page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2020.3.150.339
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Traditionally, in the Chinese penal system, the ideal of offenders rehabilitation was not reflected in actual punishment. Rather than the view that punishment would lead rehabilitate criminals, the view that punishment would block the possibility of rehabilitation was prevalent. For example, even in the amnesty, the emperor clarified that he would open the way for rehabilitation by releasing criminals. However, unlike the relationship between the rehabilitation and the punishment that had existed for a long time, there were proposals for releasing a criminal after a certain period of time if he was rehabilitated. This study analyzes the context and intention of these proposals, and shows one aspect of the penal system in the Qing dynasty by focusing on the amnesty.
Unlike the Ming dynasty, the exile punishments of Qing dynasty were actually executed, and the prisoners were sent to the common counties, so it was closely related to local security. Moreover, as the number of prisoners has been increasing with the increase of the population, the problem of the management of prisoners in the place of exile has inevitably been a political issue. Local officials wanted to control the number of criminals who arrived at the place of exile by releasing them. However, it was not easy to overturn the traditional legal system or set a new exile term, so Qianlong Emperor tried to solve the problem of excessive number of criminals by giving a mercy to criminals in the place of exile for 10 years.
The lists of criminals in the place of exile, identified in the Ba County Archives (巴縣檔案) help to measure the actual effect of the amnesty. It shows that the release of the prisoners, who had been stable for 10 years, did not do enough to relieve their excessiveness. This seems to be the reason why the criteria of the amnesty changed from 10 years to 3 years in the place of exile after Jiaqing period. And there were other amnesties for commuting exile. Such frequent pardons have resulted in shortening the actual exile terms of each criminal. The difference between exile punishment in Qing dynasty, the era of exile, was set by the exile distance. However, by frequently returning criminals in the name of rehabilitation, the difference in sentences was changing to the time in the place of exile. An exile term that came into the traditional Chinese penal system was establishing the foundation for setting a prison term even before the introduction of modern criminal law.
Unlike the Ming dynasty, the exile punishments of Qing dynasty were actually executed, and the prisoners were sent to the common counties, so it was closely related to local security. Moreover, as the number of prisoners has been increasing with the increase of the population, the problem of the management of prisoners in the place of exile has inevitably been a political issue. Local officials wanted to control the number of criminals who arrived at the place of exile by releasing them. However, it was not easy to overturn the traditional legal system or set a new exile term, so Qianlong Emperor tried to solve the problem of excessive number of criminals by giving a mercy to criminals in the place of exile for 10 years.
The lists of criminals in the place of exile, identified in the Ba County Archives (巴縣檔案) help to measure the actual effect of the amnesty. It shows that the release of the prisoners, who had been stable for 10 years, did not do enough to relieve their excessiveness. This seems to be the reason why the criteria of the amnesty changed from 10 years to 3 years in the place of exile after Jiaqing period. And there were other amnesties for commuting exile. Such frequent pardons have resulted in shortening the actual exile terms of each criminal. The difference between exile punishment in Qing dynasty, the era of exile, was set by the exile distance. However, by frequently returning criminals in the name of rehabilitation, the difference in sentences was changing to the time in the place of exile. An exile term that came into the traditional Chinese penal system was establishing the foundation for setting a prison term even before the introduction of modern criminal law.
목차
Ⅰ. 중국 전통시대의 형벌과 自新
Ⅱ. 淸代 유배형의 구조와 죄인 적체의 문제
Ⅲ. 自新을 기준으로 한 유배범 석방의 제안
Ⅳ. 황제지배체제와 赦免
Ⅴ. 巴縣檔案을 통해 본 유배범의 추이
Ⅵ. 거리에서 시간으로
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
유배형의 시대(配流刑の時代) ― 청대 유배형의 諸相을 둘러싸고 ―
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2022 .01
-
조선시대 유배제도 연구의 성과와 과제
도서문화
2021 .12
-
고려 후기 사면(赦免)의 추이와 각 시기별 특징의 분석
역사와실학
2019 .04
-
포스트휴먼 인터페이스: 옥타비아 버틀러의 「사면」에 재현된 사이버네틱스 메커니즘 읽기
새한영어영문학
2019 .08
-
고려 태조대 유배형의 시원과 실상
대구사학
2023 .05
-
국가폭력 이후의 사면: ‘가해자의 관용’과 ‘피해자의 용서’ - 1980-90년대 광주민주화운동 관련 사면을 중심으로 -
韓國史學史學報
2020 .01
-
淸代 流配犯의 實相과 地方의 管理策 -四川省 巴縣의 사례를 중심으로-
중국사연구
2021 .10
-
唐代 赦書에 보이는 ‘五逆’의 意味
중국사연구
2018 .01
-
秦漢時代赦令與社會身份秩序整飭
동서인문
2022 .08
-
조선의 유배형과 다산 정약용
다산과 현대
2016 .12
-
‘难免(不)VP’ 구문 연구
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2016 .04
-
진(秦)·한초(漢初) 사면(赦免)대상 확대 양상과 한문제(漢文帝) 형법개혁
인문논총
2023 .05
-
중국 조선족학교 档案馆 운영 실태 및 그 특징
한국민족문화
2019 .05
-
김려(金?)의 유배 문인 형상화 고찰
국문학연구
2021 .11
-
명대 공문서의 보존과 散佚
전북사학
2024 .03
-
일제강점기 대전형무소 설치와 확대
한국독립운동사연구
2021 .02
-
新羅 文武王 9년(669) 赦書에 보이는 ‘五逆’의 再檢討
동국사학
2017 .01
-
한국과 중국의 문화정책 비교 : 문화예술지원을 중심으로
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .11
-
중국의 외교문서 공개 및 출판 사례 연구－대륙과 대만의 사례를 포괄하여－
史叢(사총)
2020 .01
-
고려 목종·현종대 실시된 사면과 은전의 내용 분석과 그 특징
사학연구
2021 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-910-000513318