메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
남아름 (인천대학교) 김상림 (인천대학교)
저널정보
한국생활과학회 한국생활과학회지 한국생활과학회지 제29권 제1호
발행연도
2020.2
수록면
17 - 30 (14page)
DOI
10.5934/kjhe.2020.29.1.17

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The paratext of picture books is an essential element that makes picture books exist, and it can not be discussed except for the paratext in picture book composition. The purpose of this study was to analyze the recent trends of domestic studies related to paratext of picture books, and specifically, the study was conducted based on the year, research method, and research contents of the papers in domestic journals.
To examine the study questions, 100 papers were analyzed in major journals September 1998-2019. The results of this study can be summarized as follow: First, there are one or two papers in the 1990s and 2000s, and more than 10 papers in 2016. Second, the literature research was the most common type of research, and the method of collecting data was the literature collection. As for the data analysis method, the literature review accounted for more than half of the papers, and all the research methods of the papers related to the paratext of picture books were related to the literature (picture books). Third, the contents of the study were classified into paratext, peritext, and epitext, and the results of analyzing the detailed areas showed that the research using peritext accounted for 90% of the total papers. However, as the significance of the epitext, the standard for selecting picture books for infants, is emphasized, it is necessary to study the picture book paratext that includes peritext as well as epitext. This study is meaningful in that it examined the research trends focusing on domestic journals as a cornerstone for empirical research on the paratext of picture books in the future.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 해석
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (65)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-590-000455062