지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Vol.8 No.2 JUNE 2005
- 발행연도
- 2005.6
- 수록면
- 45 - 63 (19page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article investigates the historical characteristics of bourgeois nationalism in the colonial period while keeping in mind to compare it with civil nationalism which resisted the despotic political structure of Korean. Korean nationalism grew after experiencing setbacks and suppression since its conception as a response to the shock of imperialism in the latter half of the 19th century. Korean nationalism during the Japanese colonial period in particular became exalted through the March 1st Movement of 1919, after which it suffered an ideological division into capitalism and socialism. Bourgeois nationalism which emerged in the 1920s with great volition advocated for independence and self-determination of the people based on the acceptance of the principles of the ideology of liberalism and bourgeois democracy. And the economic national movements (encouragement of native products) unfolded in early 1920s with the goal of establishing autonomous national economy under the lead of the Korean bourgeoisie received great support from the Korean people.
The ideological leadership of the bourgeoisie, however, could not continue for long in the colonial Korean society, because the advocated nationalism was perceived by the Korean people as a mobilizing ideology that requires unilateral fortitude over “personal” sacrifice. The bourgeoisie were active in utilizing national movements for capital movements, but they were passive or even indifferent to skyrocketing prices of “Joseon products” resulting from the movement process and in social problems faced by the people. As well, they attempted to justify the nationalism that they advocated by transmitting ultranationalistic awareness based on the founding myth to the people. Rather than attempting to gain agreement from the colonial Korean society, they attempted to educate from the top down only. The industrial bourgeoisie with modern knowledge and capital as well as pioneering characteristics was one of the key forces leading nationalism in colonial Korea, but the distance between it and the colonial Korean society widened as time passed. They became a part of the dominant system of the industrial policy advocated by the Japanese Government-General in Joseon under the supposed purpose of self-reliance of “the Joseon economy” since they began to accept the state-led economic ideology after the Great Depression. Bourgeois nationalism of the Korean capitalists transitioned into the main body that accepted and practiced the ideology of the Japanese fascist system (modern totalitarianism) based on the emperor as Japan entered wartime at the end of Japanese imperialism. As such, bourgeoisie nationalism experienced the cycle of highs and lows during the colonial period; the fragility of the ideology of liberalism and ultra-nationalistic national consciousness of Korean bourgeoisie became the key variable in the abandonment of bourgeois nationalism along with the challenge from the laborers and peasants as well as fascistization of Japanese nationalism.
Bourgeois nationalism of Korean capitalists turned into anti-Communist nationalism of the Republic of Korea after liberation, thereby maintaining cooperation with the tyrannical government. If the progressive tendency of Korean nationalism of the 1920s can be “revived” in the future, it will become a process through which the historical shadow from colonial experience will be shed on the one hand, and provide a possibility for creating a Korean model for social development by reaching a social agreement between capital and civil society the other hand. From this perspective, bourgeois nationalism of the Japanese colonial period simultaneous reveals potential and limitations.
The ideological leadership of the bourgeoisie, however, could not continue for long in the colonial Korean society, because the advocated nationalism was perceived by the Korean people as a mobilizing ideology that requires unilateral fortitude over “personal” sacrifice. The bourgeoisie were active in utilizing national movements for capital movements, but they were passive or even indifferent to skyrocketing prices of “Joseon products” resulting from the movement process and in social problems faced by the people. As well, they attempted to justify the nationalism that they advocated by transmitting ultranationalistic awareness based on the founding myth to the people. Rather than attempting to gain agreement from the colonial Korean society, they attempted to educate from the top down only. The industrial bourgeoisie with modern knowledge and capital as well as pioneering characteristics was one of the key forces leading nationalism in colonial Korea, but the distance between it and the colonial Korean society widened as time passed. They became a part of the dominant system of the industrial policy advocated by the Japanese Government-General in Joseon under the supposed purpose of self-reliance of “the Joseon economy” since they began to accept the state-led economic ideology after the Great Depression. Bourgeois nationalism of the Korean capitalists transitioned into the main body that accepted and practiced the ideology of the Japanese fascist system (modern totalitarianism) based on the emperor as Japan entered wartime at the end of Japanese imperialism. As such, bourgeoisie nationalism experienced the cycle of highs and lows during the colonial period; the fragility of the ideology of liberalism and ultra-nationalistic national consciousness of Korean bourgeoisie became the key variable in the abandonment of bourgeois nationalism along with the challenge from the laborers and peasants as well as fascistization of Japanese nationalism.
Bourgeois nationalism of Korean capitalists turned into anti-Communist nationalism of the Republic of Korea after liberation, thereby maintaining cooperation with the tyrannical government. If the progressive tendency of Korean nationalism of the 1920s can be “revived” in the future, it will become a process through which the historical shadow from colonial experience will be shed on the one hand, and provide a possibility for creating a Korean model for social development by reaching a social agreement between capital and civil society the other hand. From this perspective, bourgeois nationalism of the Japanese colonial period simultaneous reveals potential and limitations.
목차
Top-Down Nationalism and the Commercial Bourgeoisie in the Latter Half of the Nineteenth Century
Economic Nationalism and Industrial Bourgeoisie under the Japanese Colonial Rule
Increasing Fascist Tendency of Japanese Nationalism and Korean Bourgeois Nationalism
Prospect
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Problems of Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
-
Historical Characteristics of Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
-
The Korean Nationalism and Its Leading Force
Korea Journal
1981 .02
-
Economic Development Plan and Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
-
20세기 전반 한국 사상계의 궤적과 민족주의 담론
한국사연구
2010 .09
-
Rethinking Chinese Nationalism in Transnational Contexts
외국학연구
2015 .01
-
역사 사료적으로 살펴본 3·1운동 관련 ‘문헌’
신학지남
2019 .03
-
Using the Enemy’s Vocabularies : Rethinking the Origins of Student Anti-State Nationalism in 1980s Korea
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .09
-
Leading Class and Leadership in Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
-
Trials and Challenges Facing Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
-
Nationalism 槪念設定을 爲한 小考
역사교육
1958 .07
-
Korean Nationalism : Its Origins and Transformation
Korea Journal
1983 .02
-
American Foreign Policy and Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
-
신동엽의 시세계와 민족주의
한국시학연구
2001 .05
-
Nationalism, Post-Nationalism, and Shin Ch`ae-ho
Korea Journal
1999 .06
-
韓國 近現代史 敎育에서 民族主義와 近代主體
역사교육
2005 .09
-
Nationalism and Korean Businessmen Under Japanese Colonial Rule
Korea Journal
1977 .01
-
민족주의 연구를 둘러싼 새로운 시각
대구사학
2014 .01
-
한국 근대 역사개념의 성립 ―‘국사’의 탄생과 신채호의 민족사학―
韓國史學史學報
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000955360