메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한산부인과학회 Obstetrics & Gynecology Science Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 제62권 제6호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
454 - 461 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the prevalence and determinants of folic acid supplementation among womenreferred to community health centers. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted in 325 women referred to community health centers. The subjects wereselected from 8 community health centers, using a stratified sampling technique. Data regarding demographics,socioeconomic status, obstetrics, folic acid supplementation status, and household food security status were obtainedvia questionnaires. The data was analyzed in SPSS v22. ResultsThe prevalence of folic acid supplementation both before and during pregnancy was 54.5%. The results of the studyshowed that folic acid supplementation had a significant positive association with education level (odds ratio [OR],0.441; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.199–0.977; P<0.05), being employed (OR, 0.353; 95% CI, 0.148–0.840; P<0.05),and planned pregnancy (OR, 18.113; 95% CI, 7.371–44.51; P<0.001). However, other variables, including age,husband’s age, husband’s education and employment status, the number of prior pregnancies, economic satisfaction,and household food security, were nonsignificant factors affecting folic acid supplementation. ConclusionWomen with lower socioeconomic status are less likely to take folic acid supplements, and more effort should bemade to increase their awareness of the importance of supplementation. Unplanned pregnancy is another strong riskfactor for not supplementing with folic acid, and thus should be avoided.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0