지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Fragment answers, involving a type of ellipsis that occurs in answers to questions, appear very frequently in dialogue in varied forms. This paper focuses on negated fragment answers including the negator not. The key question for the analysis of negated fragments (e.g., Not money) is then how to resolve their sentential meaning from incomplete syntax. There have been two main strands: deletion-based sentential and direct interpretation-based non-sentential approaches. The former seeks matching correspondences from the postulation of putative clausal sources and then allows mismatching by deletion processes. Meantime, the latter licences non-correspondences at syntax but achieves the effects of correspondences from the structured discourse interacting with syntax and semantics. This paper offers a direct interpretation approach that can avoid the pitfalls sentential approaches could encounter from the postulation of clausal sources for negated fragments.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Deletion-based Sentential Analyses
3. A Direct Interpretation Analysis
4. Discussion and Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
Ginzburg, Jonathan / 2000 / Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives
Groenendijk, Jeroen / 1984 / Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers
Hamblin, Charles / 1973 / Questions in Montague English / Foundations of Language 10(1):41~53
Jacobson, Pauline / 2016 / The short answer : Implications for direct compositionality(and vice versa) / Language 92(2):331~375
Karttunen, Lauri / 1977 / Syntax and semantics of questions / Linguistics and Philosophy 1:3~44
Groenendijk, Jeroen / 1984 / Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers
Hamblin, Charles / 1973 / Questions in Montague English / Foundations of Language 10(1):41~53
Jacobson, Pauline / 2016 / The short answer : Implications for direct compositionality(and vice versa) / Language 92(2):331~375
Karttunen, Lauri / 1977 / Syntax and semantics of questions / Linguistics and Philosophy 1:3~44
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean
언어연구
2017 .01
-
Fragments in Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
Fragment questions: A direct interpretation approach
언어연구
2021 .12
-
A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
Fragments of Self-Pronouns in English: A Direct Generation Analysis
영어학연구
2018 .01
-
관용표현이 조각문에 관해 말해주는 것
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
On Caseless Fragments and Some Implications
어학연구
2017 .08
-
Notes on Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments: A Reply to Chung (2019)
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
Asymmetry of Deletion within the Pied-Piping Fragment
언어와 정보
2019 .02
-
국어 조각구에 관한 분석
언어학 연구
2016 .04
-
Idiomatic Fragment Answers in Negation
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
Case and Postposition Stranding in Multiple Fragments : Why is the Final Fragment (not) Special?
어학연구
2015 .12
-
Some Notes on Ahn and Cho‘s (2017a, b, c) Approach to Fragment Answers in Korean
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
Non-movement vs. Movement in Japanese Dative Case-marked Fragment
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
Notes on Fragments with Tag Questions in English and Korean
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
Fragment answers in Korean: A direct interpretation approach
언어연구
2016 .01
-
The Derivational Aspects of Korean Non-contrastive Heavy Adnominal Fragments: Two Strategies
생성문법연구
2016 .01
-
한국어 조각문의 형성 과정: (이동과) 생략
언어와 정보사회
2017 .07
-
Right Dislocation vs. Fragment: A Reply to Ko (2014)
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
Inverse Scope and Indirect Negation
생성문법연구
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0