지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to account for idiosyncratic properties of fragment answers (FAs) as answers to wh-questions in Korean, focusing on case identity and generating issues. The main issue on FAs is the existence of the (case-) marker attached to fragment NP(s), which is a crucial factor to analyze how each fragment is linked to each corresponding wh-phrase and how it conveys a desirable sentential meaning. Further, FAs can occur with adjunct phrases with no correlates. To account for the various properties of FAs, we take the Direct Interpretation Approach (DIA) to claim that contra to the Ellipsis Approach (EA), Korean FA constructions can be accounted for by proposing a Korean FA construction with minimum syntactic constraints within the Construction Grammar. In doing so, we assume semantic and pragmatic information on an answerer’s background knowledge including question under discussions (QUD) to get a full sentential reading from FAs. This enables us to explain peculiar properties of the FAs in Korean.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
Ahn, Hee-Don / 2012 / Fragments in English and Korean / Hankwuk Publishing
안희돈 / 2006 / On Form-Function Mismatch Puzzles in Fragments: An Ellipsis Approach / 담화와 인지 13(1):91~110
안희돈 / 2012 / On Caseless Fragments in Korean / 현대문법연구 (70):25~47
Barton, Ellen / 1990 / Nonsentential constituents / John Benjamins
Barton, Ellen / 2005 / Ellipsis and nonsentential speech / Springer :71~93
안희돈 / 2006 / On Form-Function Mismatch Puzzles in Fragments: An Ellipsis Approach / 담화와 인지 13(1):91~110
안희돈 / 2012 / On Caseless Fragments in Korean / 현대문법연구 (70):25~47
Barton, Ellen / 1990 / Nonsentential constituents / John Benjamins
Barton, Ellen / 2005 / Ellipsis and nonsentential speech / Springer :71~93
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean
언어연구
2017 .01
-
Fragments in Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
Fragment questions: A direct interpretation approach
언어연구
2021 .12
-
국어 조각구에 관한 분석
언어학 연구
2016 .04
-
Negated Fragments: A Direct Interpretation Approach
영어학
2020 .03
-
관용표현이 조각문에 관해 말해주는 것
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
Fragments of Self-Pronouns in English: A Direct Generation Analysis
영어학연구
2018 .01
-
Why-Stripping in English and Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
한국어의 의문사 조각구문과 유사수문구문
언어과학연구
2021 .09
-
한국어 조각문의 형성 과정: (이동과) 생략
언어와 정보사회
2017 .07
-
Notes on Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments: A Reply to Chung (2019)
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
Asymmetry of Deletion within the Pied-Piping Fragment
언어와 정보
2019 .02
-
On the Licensing Condition for Corrective Fragments
영어학
2015 .12
-
Case and Postposition Stranding in Multiple Fragments : Why is the Final Fragment (not) Special?
어학연구
2015 .12
-
또 하나의 주어: 한국어 이중 주어 구문
현대문법연구
2018 .01
-
Notes on Fragments with Tag Questions in English and Korean
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
Some Notes on Ahn and Cho‘s (2017a, b, c) Approach to Fragment Answers in Korean
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
The Resolution of Wh-Scope Ambiguity in Korean and Locality Bias
어학연구
2015 .04
-
Adjunct Ellipsis and Licensing Conditions
언어와언어학
2022 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0