메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국법철학회 법철학연구 법철학연구 제12권 제1호
발행연도
2009.5
수록면
353 - 376 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper analyzes a normative concept on the basis of the philosophical discussion about a concept formation and the performative speech act theory of J. L. Austin. In this work we can construct five standards to form a normative concept. The first, the normative concept formation starts from the overriding normative discourse. I`ll call it the Overriding Discourse Thesis. The second, the utility of a normative concept shall be considered. I`ll call it the Utility Thesis. The third, the concept needs to satisfy the five felicity conditions of the performative speech action proposed by J. L. Austin, ① an accepted conventional procedure to the utterance, ② the appreciation of the person and circumstances for the conventional procedure, ③ the corrective and completive execution of the procedure, ④ the participant`s truth, ⑤ the participant`s consistency of speech and action. I`ll call it the Performance Thesis. The fourth, the contents of a normative concept shall be proper. The judgement whether the contents are proper or not can be divided two, a coincidence judgement with the purpose as the belief and a truth or false judgement about the phenomenon description. I`ll call it the Fit Thesis. But we can not form a normative concept with only these conditions. Specially the second condition, the Utility Thesis and the third, the Fit Thesis have many problems. The second condition, the Utility Thesis has so task for the utility judgement of a normative concept as what are the standards of a utility judgement. This work connects with our beliefs. The fourth condition, the Fit Thesis, connects with them also as the Utility Thesis. Because we should estimate the belief to judge if the contents of a normative concept are proper. The only its difference from the Utility Thesis is that it concludes the judgement not only about the belief but also about the truth or false of the phenomenon description. But the truth or false judgement of a descriptive sentence, as J. L. Austin says, is not apart from the human belief system. This study shows that a normative concept cannot be formed apart from the belief system. Therefore for forming a normative concept we need to review how the belief system is confirmed. However the belief is the confidence for realizing our desires and another name of our desires. The desires are the power of human life. These cannot be judged by good or evil and are a life`s will that includes death. These desires change and are arranged with belief. And then on the basis of the belief system a normative concept is formed. A normative concept connects closely with our desires. Our desires to realize something are the motive power to form a normative concept. So this will confirms the belief system or the judgement standard to judge if the concept is proper. But our desires lose the subjecthood and trap us. Therefore we need to reflect on our desires. So in addition to the four standards in order to form a normative concept, we need to consider and discuss what we desire by the concept. I`ll call it the Desire Thesis. In conclusion for forming a normative concept we need to consider five theses, the Overriding Discourse Thesis, the Utility Thesis, the Performance Thesis, the Fit Thesis, and the Desire Thesis.
#desire #epistemology #J. L. Austin #normative concept #오스틴 #욕망 #인식론 #sovereignty #규범개념 #주권 #speech act theory #언어행위론

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-360-001264434