지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.11
- 수록면
- 121 - 137 (17page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study explores an argument between Wu, Rulun(1840-1903) and Zhang, Yuzhao(1823-1894)。It is mainly about the “Three Rivers” issue in “Shang Shu·Yu Gong”, which was carried out intermittently from 1887 to 1888.
This argument began with an article by Zhang Yuzhao, which was the “Contemplation on “three rivers”in Yu Gong”。In this article, he mainly pointed out that Ban, Gu was inevitably wrong in “Hanshu Dilizhi”, and then advocated that there is another Nanjiang River other than the Beijiang River and the Zhongjiang River associated with the Yangtze River。This is simply an unprecedented insight, because the Sanjiang theory has always referred to three parts of the Yangtze River or three Rivers diverted from the Yangtze River.
As far as the theoretical structure is concerned, Zhang, Yuzhao is mainly based on Guo, Pu’s Sanjiang theory: Lijiang, Songjiang, and Zhejiang, which led to the new proposition that Nanjiang is a river。Wu, Rulun verified it in all aspects, and Zhang, Yuzhao refuted it。In the debate, they involve a wide range of academics, sometimes classics, sometimes texts, lexicons, geography, and so on。This shows that they are also well-versed in many academic fields.
At the same time, it is commendable that they strive to put the above academic methods and attitudes into education。The “Contemplation on “three rivers”in Yu Gong” mentioned at the beginning is written for the purpose of education.
By examining the beginning and end of the debate, although it is impossible to determine who wins or loses, it is estimated that Zhang, Yuzhao’s claim cannot be successfully recognized by Wu, Rulun。However, regardless of the outcome, this controversy makes sense, that is, they absorb new knowledge at the end of the 19th century and boldly challenge academic stereotypes, which are valuable in themselves, especially their profound knowledge of geography。In fact, this is the main background that touches the debate。
This argument began with an article by Zhang Yuzhao, which was the “Contemplation on “three rivers”in Yu Gong”。In this article, he mainly pointed out that Ban, Gu was inevitably wrong in “Hanshu Dilizhi”, and then advocated that there is another Nanjiang River other than the Beijiang River and the Zhongjiang River associated with the Yangtze River。This is simply an unprecedented insight, because the Sanjiang theory has always referred to three parts of the Yangtze River or three Rivers diverted from the Yangtze River.
As far as the theoretical structure is concerned, Zhang, Yuzhao is mainly based on Guo, Pu’s Sanjiang theory: Lijiang, Songjiang, and Zhejiang, which led to the new proposition that Nanjiang is a river。Wu, Rulun verified it in all aspects, and Zhang, Yuzhao refuted it。In the debate, they involve a wide range of academics, sometimes classics, sometimes texts, lexicons, geography, and so on。This shows that they are also well-versed in many academic fields.
At the same time, it is commendable that they strive to put the above academic methods and attitudes into education。The “Contemplation on “three rivers”in Yu Gong” mentioned at the beginning is written for the purpose of education.
By examining the beginning and end of the debate, although it is impossible to determine who wins or loses, it is estimated that Zhang, Yuzhao’s claim cannot be successfully recognized by Wu, Rulun。However, regardless of the outcome, this controversy makes sense, that is, they absorb new knowledge at the end of the 19th century and boldly challenge academic stereotypes, which are valuable in themselves, especially their profound knowledge of geography。In fact, this is the main background that touches the debate。
목차
1. 绪论
2. 论争的内容及其坐标
3. 地理形势的考察
4. 论证的环境
5. 论争之后
【參考文獻】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
韓日両言語における英語動詞の借用に関する対照研究 : 使用頻度と意味拡張の観点から
일본문화연구
2016 .01
-
台湾の世界遺産候補地をテーマにした日本語学習者の語彙拡張
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2024 .09
-
통각(痛覚) 오노마토피어에 관한 일·한 대조연구
일본어학연구
2021 .12
-
강(江) 외 1편
문학들
2020 .11
-
全羅左水營의 水塲과 鯈魚의 意味
지방사와 지방문화
2020 .05
-
8월의 江
숙명문학
2019 .11
-
『을병조천록(乙丙朝天錄)』의 허균(許筠) 독후시(讀後詩)에 대하여
연민학지
2023 .02
-
漢代 ｢洪範｣의 재탄생과 班固의 ｢五行志｣ 저술 배경
중국사연구
2019 .01
-
複合動詞「~つける」の研究 : 意味拡張の様相を中心に
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2017 .04
-
「させていただく」の拡大用法の使用実態について : 日本人母語話者と外国人日本語学習者の比較を通して
일본문화연구
2016 .07
-
한․일 감정․심리 오노마토피어 의미확장 패턴 분석
일본어문학
2016 .01
-
漢代 類論과 字論의 관계에 대한 소고
중국어문학지
2019 .01
-
1920~30년대 상하이 영화산업의 물적 토대와 특성 연구
인문사회과학연구
2019 .01
-
조선후기 민인의 하부정치
한국한문학연구
2021 .01
-
장재(張載)와 정이(程頤)의 심성론(心性論) 비교 고찰
건지인문학
2017 .01
-
한국과 일본의 소매점 변화 : 편의점을 중심으로
일본문화연구
2018 .07
-
공동부유론을 어떻게 볼 것인가
중국문학
2022 .05
-
항재 이광신의 隨事精察心理심학종지와 하곡 「浩然章」 해석의 계승
양명학
2017 .04
-
语篇视角下的“之所以~是因为~”考察
중국어교육과연구
2016 .06
-
손에 장을 지져요
수필미학
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-820-000075752