지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 미술사연구회 미술사연구 미술사연구 제39호
- 발행연도
- 2020.12
- 수록면
- 213 - 240 (28page)
- DOI
- 10.52799/JAH.2020.12.39.213
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper explores how South Korean artists in the 1970s constructed the identity of Korean art and whether their art actually was ‘Korean’ during this period of extreme nationalism. It deals with the 1970s de-Westernization of South Korean artists, who, up until the late-1960s had actively embraced various Western avant-garde art movements and approaches such as geometrical abstraction, happening, pop art, and op-art. This paper navigates different fields of production, including sculpture, installation, and monotone painting. The artists highlighted here commonly shared an aim of “anti-representationalsim” (talpyohyun) regardless of their formal genre. This tendency was derived from the ideology of Daoism (Lao-Zhuang Philosophy) which emphasized asceticism aesthetics of “Nature of Doing Nothing” (muyujayeon) and was distinctly distinguished from a specific Korean tradition. In this context, this paper considers the emergence of anti-representationalism in the 1970s, at this moment when artists attempted to establish a specific identity for Korean art. The paper focuses on Lee Ufan, a well-known Korean Mono-ha theorist in Japan at the time. Even though Mono-ha theory was based on Daoism (a wider East Asian tradition, and not specifically Korean), many Korean artists were attracted to Lee Ufan’s Mono-ha aesthetics because of his nationality. However, a more fundamental reason for this convergence was that in the late 1960s Japan had tried to break away from Western cultural hegemony, creating a situation similar to that of 1970s South Korea, where people desired to create a specific idea of ‘Korean art’ through de-Westernization. The 1965 Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea first led to active cultural exchanges between Japan and South Korea. As a result, the Korean art community was able to break away from the anti-Japanese atmosphere that had been strongly cultivated in the aftermath of post-colonial independence since 1945. These artists recognized Japanese culture as an ‘effective cultural channel’ and even demanded the area of cultural coexistence between Korea and Japan.’ They expected the formation of a common art community with Japan to overcome Western hegemony in Asia. In this respect, 1970s South Korean artists collaborated with Japanese artists by using the West as their shared antithetical Other, and help answer the historical demand of the Korean people to locate the identity of Korean art. Therefore, Korean artists did not necessarily distinguish ‘the Eastern’ (or East Asian) from ‘the Korean.’ In this circumstance, seeking the identity of Korean art served as a device to help create a wider imaginary cultural community.
This paper argues that one of the most important formative features of monotone painting was not the use of ‘white’ but the concern with ‘anti-representationalsim.’ Although the use of ‘white’ has long been critically established as a signature nationally specific interest of the monotone painting movement, South Korean monotone painters in fact did not recognize ‘white’ as a tradition to inherit or propagate, nor did they pay particular attention to the color itself. Therefore, this paper argues that it is inaccurate to label the exhibition Korea: Five Artists, Five Whites held at the Donggyeong art gallery in 1975 as the starting point of Korean monochrome painting, or to name ‘monochorme painting as “Dansaekhwa.”
This paper argues that one of the most important formative features of monotone painting was not the use of ‘white’ but the concern with ‘anti-representationalsim.’ Although the use of ‘white’ has long been critically established as a signature nationally specific interest of the monotone painting movement, South Korean monotone painters in fact did not recognize ‘white’ as a tradition to inherit or propagate, nor did they pay particular attention to the color itself. Therefore, this paper argues that it is inaccurate to label the exhibition Korea: Five Artists, Five Whites held at the Donggyeong art gallery in 1975 as the starting point of Korean monochrome painting, or to name ‘monochorme painting as “Dansaekhwa.”
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 1970년대 미술가들의 정체성 모색의 근간, ‘동양철학’과 ‘탈표현’
Ⅲ. 1970년대 한국미술에서 ‘동양적인 것’과 ‘범자연주의’
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1950년대의 한국미술(1), 제1공화국 미술의 태동과 진통
미술사논단
2015 .06
-
1930년대 서양화단의 성장과 학생화가들 : 도화교사의 역할을 중심으로
한국근현대미술사학
2016 .07
-
아시아의 ‘또 다른’ 회화(繪畫)에 대하여
미술사논단
2023 .06
-
[ARTIST] 물속에서 세계 짓기
아트인컬처
2025 .02
-
1970년대 한국 단색조 회화의 無爲自然 사상
미술사논단
2015 .06
-
20세기 초 독일미술사 문헌이 그린 한국미술 지형도
미술사논단
2024 .12
-
노마디즘 공간적 특성을 적용한 미술대학 공간계획에 관한 연구
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .11
-
한국 전통회화의 국제성과 독창성 역사와 근현대의 수묵채색화
미술사논단
2024 .12
-
[Emerging Artist] 꿈이 이루어지는 지금 여기, We Are!
월간사진
2024 .09
-
대구 근대 서양화풍의 특색과 현대에의 계승문제 : 강우문·이경희의 서양화를 중심으로
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .07
-
대구근대화단의 일본인 미술가의 규모와 한일 미술교류
한국근현대미술사학
2022 .12
-
‘직업 예술인’의 정체성 - 복수의 직업 정체성을 지닌 예술가와의 심층인터뷰를 중심으로 -
한국영상학회논문집
2015 .01
-
이강소와 《대구현대미술제》 : 1970년대 전반기를 중심으로
한국근현대미술사학
2024 .07
-
아시아와 여성, 추상미술의 서구중심주의를 넘어서
미술사논단
2019 .12
-
예술가교사(teaching artist) 체험에 관한 생애사 연구
조형교육
2024 .02
-
‘개인’의 위치 : 2010년대 미술가/개인의 존재 방식과 사회적 발언
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .12
-
한국 현대미술사에서 ‘단색조 회화’의 연구 동향
미술사논단
2020 .06
-
한국 전쟁 기 북한을 방문한 중국화가들
미술사학
2015 .08
-
Art can do it!
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .08
-
Art is everywhere
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0