지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중앙대학교 일본연구소 일본연구 일본연구 제54집
- 발행연도
- 2021.2
- 수록면
- 49 - 69 (21page)
- DOI
- 10.20404/jscau.2021.02.54.49
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is a study of the sentence pattern and usage in Japanese adjective predicative sentences that express Idoukankei. The adjectives that express the meaning of Idoukankei include the original adjective hitosii (“to be equal”) and the transferred adjectives chikai and tooi (“near” and “far,” respectively). These two types of adjectives differ in many ways, such as how they are used in sentence pattern and the characteristics of their usage. The overall results of the analysis are as follows.
(1) Hitosii has two uses: “judgment of similarity based on comparative criteria” and “judgment of sameness.” The main sentence patterns of the former were “N2ha･ga＋N1ni＋A” and “N3ni＋N2ha･ga＋N1ni＋A”; for the latter, they were “N1ha･ga＋A,” “N2ha･ga＋N1to＋A,” and “N2ha･ga＋N1ni＋A.”
(2) The main usage of chikai and tooi was: “judgement of movement based on comparison criteria.” The main sentence patterns of this usage were “N2ha･ga＋N1ni＋A,” ‘N2ha･ga＋N1to＋A,” and “N3ni＋N2ha･ga＋N1ni･kara＋A.”
(3) The usages “judgment of similarity based on comparative criteria” for hitosii and “judgement of movement based on comparison criteria” for the phrase “chikai, tooi” shared many similar characteristics, including the number of different categories in the sentence, use of postposition, subject of the judgment, and replacement of the noun phrases themselves (or the order). However, there was no single-category sentence in these usages.
(4) The usage “judgment of sameness” for hitosii indicates the comparison of multiple objects. The main sentence patterns were single-category sentences in which hitosii replaced the noun phrase itself and two-category sentences in which the order changed such that the subject was not being judged.
(5) As the main usage of the postposition, ni and kara represented the criteria for judgment and to the object of the judgment.
(1) Hitosii has two uses: “judgment of similarity based on comparative criteria” and “judgment of sameness.” The main sentence patterns of the former were “N2ha･ga＋N1ni＋A” and “N3ni＋N2ha･ga＋N1ni＋A”; for the latter, they were “N1ha･ga＋A,” “N2ha･ga＋N1to＋A,” and “N2ha･ga＋N1ni＋A.”
(2) The main usage of chikai and tooi was: “judgement of movement based on comparison criteria.” The main sentence patterns of this usage were “N2ha･ga＋N1ni＋A,” ‘N2ha･ga＋N1to＋A,” and “N3ni＋N2ha･ga＋N1ni･kara＋A.”
(3) The usages “judgment of similarity based on comparative criteria” for hitosii and “judgement of movement based on comparison criteria” for the phrase “chikai, tooi” shared many similar characteristics, including the number of different categories in the sentence, use of postposition, subject of the judgment, and replacement of the noun phrases themselves (or the order). However, there was no single-category sentence in these usages.
(4) The usage “judgment of sameness” for hitosii indicates the comparison of multiple objects. The main sentence patterns were single-category sentences in which hitosii replaced the noun phrase itself and two-category sentences in which the order changed such that the subject was not being judged.
(5) As the main usage of the postposition, ni and kara represented the criteria for judgment and to the object of the judgment.
목차
1. はじめに
2. ｢異同関係｣を表す形容詞述語
3. ｢異同関係｣を表す形容詞述語文の主要文型と用法
4. おわりに
参考文献
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
2項目形容詞述語文の文型と用法
일본연구
2015 .02
-
｢N2は(が)＋N1が＋形｣文型の形容詞述語文の用法
일본연구
2016 .02
-
「感覚」を表す形容詞述語文の文型と用法
일본연구
2017 .02
-
｢親疎関係｣を表す形容詞述語文の文型と用法
일본연구
2020 .02
-
形容詞述語文における助詞「を」の文型と用法
외국학연구
2017 .01
-
「感情」を表す形容詞述語文の文型と用法
외국학연구
2018 .01
-
「可能性」を表す形容詞述語文の文型と用法
외국학연구
2022 .03
-
「ばかり」の記述的研究 −「限定」用法と「程度」用法を中心に−
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2023 .09
-
한국어 문형에 대한 일고찰
동악어문학
2020 .06
-
現代日本語における「あくまで（も）」の意味 · 用法
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2018 .09
-
접속토 “-다가”의 문법적의미와 용법 연구
중국조선어문
2016 .09
-
≪老子≫의 語氣詞 用法 考察
건지인문학
2021 .01
-
「させていただく」の拡大用法の使用実態について : 日本人母語話者と外国人日本語学習者の比較を通して
일본문화연구
2016 .07
-
학습자 중심의 한국어 문형 교육을 위한 제언
코기토
2017 .06
-
「～が 好きだ」와 「～を 好きだ」에 대하여
일본연구
2015 .08
-
文頭における｢でなければ｣の構文分析
일본어문학
2023 .02
-
専攻選択科目JLPT(N2)対策の授業実践 - 学習効果と学習者の認識を中心に -
일본문화학보
2022 .05
-
教育的観点からみた典型的な「たくさん」の使用方法―名詞の数量が多いことを表す場合―
日本學硏究
2022 .09
-
러시아어 명사의 무인칭 서술어 기능과 융합: ‘Мне охота спать.’ 문형을 중심으로
슬라브학보
2024 .12
-
‘-는지 알다/모르다’ 관련 한국어 교육용 표현 문형의 설정에 대한 제안
열린정신 인문학연구
2019 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-309-001469263