메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이윤경 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
한국구약학회 구약논단 구약논단 제27권 제1호 통권79집
발행연도
2021.3
수록면
214 - 243 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper attempts to reconstruct the conflict of Trito-Isaiah by focusing on the “Haredim” in Isaiah 66. Since Hanson’s work, the authorial group of Trito-Isaiah has been understood to oppose the Zadokites, leading to the rebuilding of the Temple. However, considering that Deutero-Isaiah was a work that came out of the anticipation of returning to Jerusalem in the Persian era, it makes no sense to deduce that the subsequent Trito-Isaiah would have opposed the Persia-sponsored temple reconstruction. Instead, those who returned from Persia would have sought to restore a Judean society in Jerusalem, sympathizing with Persian colonial policy. In this respect, Trito-Isaiah can be seen as the work of the Golah community, seemingly comparable to Ezra and Nehemiah.
The Golah community was religiously opposed to syncretistic rites and politically aligned themselves with Persian policy. Scholars have studied the Haredim in Isaiah 66 along with Ezra 9-10. But there has been no serious attention to the different social roles of Haredim in these two texts. In Isaiah 66, the Haredim were excluded by their brothers. In contrast, the Haredim in Ezra 9-10 excluded foreign wives and their children from the Judean community. Although the social roles of the Haredim in these two texts are in stark contrast, scholars identify the two Haredim as the same group. It is thus necessary to examine why those who used the same group name were divided, rather than to claim that these two Haredim were the same group. In this paper, the cause of their different roles is traced to the different social status of the exiles and, more importantly, their different attitudes toward foreigners, especially whether to include them in Temple worship. Therefore, although both Trito-Isaiah and Ezra insist on “Haredim,” there was a debate over the Haredim’s identity, and as a result, Haredim were internally divided.

목차

1. 문제 제기
2. 성전재건은 포로후기 유다 공동체 내부 분열의 원인이 되었을까?
3. 하레딤은 누구였을까?
4. 이사야 66장의 하레딤과 에스라 9-10장의 하레딤은 왜 분열하였을까?
5. 결론
6. 참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0