지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Quite recently, two interesting approaches to generics have been put forth, both of which attempt to account for generics based on the notions of alternative sets of entities and features, and relative generics. They are both argued to have much in common with Leslie’s (2008, 2013) cognition-based approach, but grounded on Cohen’s (1999) analysis of relative generics. However, they differ in that the approach by van Rooij and Schulz (2020) tries to explain various generics with the representativeness of features, i.e., value(f), whereas the other by Tessler and Goodman (2019) resorts to one’s prior expectations. In this context, the primary purpose of this paper is to review these new theories on generics and address some shortcomings of these approaches. In doing so, we will propose that the appropriateness of a generic is judged depending on how people perceive its exceptions with their encyclopedic and contextual knowledge. This position will be supported by experimental results.
목차
ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Previous Approaches
3. A Critical Review
4. The Experiment
5. Discussions and Conclusions
References
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
Cahill, L. / 1995 / The amygdala and emotional memory / Nature 377:295~296
Cheng, P. W / 1997 / From covariation to causation: A causal power theory / Psychological Review 104:367~405
Cimpien, A. / 2010 / Generic statements require little evidence for acceptance but have powerful implications / Cognitive Science 34:1452~1482
Cohen, A / 1996 / Think Generic: The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences
Cohen, A / 1999 / Generics, frequency adverbs, and probability / Linguistics and Philosophy 22(3):221~253
Cheng, P. W / 1997 / From covariation to causation: A causal power theory / Psychological Review 104:367~405
Cimpien, A. / 2010 / Generic statements require little evidence for acceptance but have powerful implications / Cognitive Science 34:1452~1482
Cohen, A / 1996 / Think Generic: The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences
Cohen, A / 1999 / Generics, frequency adverbs, and probability / Linguistics and Philosophy 22(3):221~253
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Non-conventionalized Generics and Exceptions
영어학
2023 .01
-
Two Different Mechanisms for Generics
영어영문학
2020 .05
-
Generics and Conceptualizations
어학연구
2019 .12
-
In the Middle of Korean Middles
언어학 연구
2022 .10
-
한국인 영어 학습자의 총칭 정관사와 유일 정관사 습득 양상
언어와 정보사회
2019 .01
-
The Syntactic Representation of Genericity and the Unnecessity of the Stage- and Individual-level Predicate Distinction
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
An Investigation of the Generic Structure and Lexico-Grammatical Features of the Discussion Section of Research Articles
영어영문학21
2018 .01
-
現代漢語“有VP”的三個特殊句式
중국어문학지
2022 .03
-
19세기 중국 대표자역본(Delegates’ version) 과정의 신명(神名) 논쟁 재고찰
신학사상
2022 .06
-
Generic Analysis of Japanese Right-Wing Politicians’ Rhetoric on the Colonization of Korea and the Wartime Atrocities
한국수사학회 학술대회
2015 .11
-
유개념에 대한 맹자의 인식과 활용
孔子學
2015 .11
-
한국어 주격 표지 ‘-이/가’와 화제의 표시
언어연구
2019 .01
-
The Role of L3 in the Interpretation of Articles with Definite Plurals in L2 English
Journal of Asia TEFL
2019 .01
-
명시적 장르 규범 교수가 한국어 교육 분야 연구 보고서 장르 서론의 형식적 체제에 미치는 영향
외국어로서의 한국어교육
2015 .01
-
그레코-로만 전기의 장르적 특성에 비추어본 복음서 해석: 마가복음 1:16-20절을 중심으로
신약연구
2020 .01
-
Non-prototypical uses of the generic you as a stance marker: A view from Kamio’s Territory of Information (1997)
언어연구
2021 .09
-
현대중국어 ‘很少’에 대한 소고
중국학논총
2023 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0