지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.8
- 수록면
- 61 - 79 (19page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background: The digital era has influenced the whole global economy and its job market. This environment has changed many current mandatory skills and has created many new job positions. User experience (UX) design is an emerging career for developing user experience and satisfaction, but there is no consensus for its competencies. We developed a competency model for UX designers, considering value creation for today"s business climate.
Methods: The elements of the UX competency model were extracted through a systematic literature review in design and human-computer interaction. Content and thematic analysis were deployed to cluster diverse elements into distinct units that illustrated the competency model for a UX designer. The model evaluation was based on judgments of 25 experts using snowball sampling.
Results: Our UXD competency model had four domains, nine units and 63 elements of competency. CVI, modified kappa, and Cronbach’s alpha confirmed the validity and reliability of the model. Each unit was classified into three types to differentiate functions and significance with t-tests. The Core competencies were design research and usability value. Functional competencies were design principle, design process, aesthetic value, information art, business acumen and project management. Information technology was found to be cross-functional competency.
Conclusions: Our derived UXD competency model illustrated every dimension in the well-rounded proficiencies needed for UX designers in the digital age. The model covered UXD tasks and contexts in the digital age, and can be generalized for human resource development as a framework for UXD job analysis in a design or technology organization.
Methods: The elements of the UX competency model were extracted through a systematic literature review in design and human-computer interaction. Content and thematic analysis were deployed to cluster diverse elements into distinct units that illustrated the competency model for a UX designer. The model evaluation was based on judgments of 25 experts using snowball sampling.
Results: Our UXD competency model had four domains, nine units and 63 elements of competency. CVI, modified kappa, and Cronbach’s alpha confirmed the validity and reliability of the model. Each unit was classified into three types to differentiate functions and significance with t-tests. The Core competencies were design research and usability value. Functional competencies were design principle, design process, aesthetic value, information art, business acumen and project management. Information technology was found to be cross-functional competency.
Conclusions: Our derived UXD competency model illustrated every dimension in the well-rounded proficiencies needed for UX designers in the digital age. The model covered UXD tasks and contexts in the digital age, and can be generalized for human resource development as a framework for UXD job analysis in a design or technology organization.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Method of Competency Modeling
4. Result
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
Ahdika, A. / 2017 / Improvement of quality, interest, critical, and analytical thinking ability of students through the application of research based learning(RBL)in introduction to stochastic processes subject / International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 12(2):167~191
American Institute of Graphic Arts / AIGA designer 2025: Why design education should pay attention to trends
Per Åman / 2017 / The Scope of Design Knowledge: Integrating the Technically Rational and Human-Centered Dimensions / Design Issues 33(2):58~69
Jeremy Ashley / 2007 / Working with c-level executives / Interactions 14(3):29~30
David Benyon / 2012 / Presence in blended spaces / Interacting with Computers 24(4):219~226
American Institute of Graphic Arts / AIGA designer 2025: Why design education should pay attention to trends
Per Åman / 2017 / The Scope of Design Knowledge: Integrating the Technically Rational and Human-Centered Dimensions / Design Issues 33(2):58~69
Jeremy Ashley / 2007 / Working with c-level executives / Interactions 14(3):29~30
David Benyon / 2012 / Presence in blended spaces / Interacting with Computers 24(4):219~226
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
패션디자이너 역량모델링 구축
한국의류산업학회지
2018 .01
-
국내 실무에서 요구되는 UX디자이너 핵심 역량 분석
Journal of Integrated Design Research
2021 .03
-
공공체육시설 스포츠지도사의 직무 역량 우선순위 분석
스포츠사이언스
2023 .04
-
벨리댄스 참여자가 인식하는 지도자 주요 역량 탐색 및 요구도 분석 연구
한국체육과학회지
2021 .10
-
FUXD, 몰입경험을 유도하는 UXD 프레임 제안
한국디자인포럼
2019 .01
-
피부미용 졸업생의 NCS 직업기초능력과 하위능력에 대한 산업체의 교육요구도 분석
대한미용학회지
2020 .01
-
미용 특성화 고등학생의 핵심역량분석
한국인체미용예술학회지
2023 .03
-
역량모델에 따른 디자이너의 개인적 역량에 관한 연구 - 일반적역량과 디자인역량을 중심으로 -
일러스트레이션 포럼
2024 .09
-
디자인전공 대학(원)생에게 필요한 디자이너 역량 우선순위 결정에 관한 연구 -시각디자인 전공을 중심으로-
한국디자인문화학회지
2021 .09
-
사물인터넷 환경에서 효과적인 UXD를 위한 사례 연구 : 스마트홈 사례를 중심으로
한국디자인문화학회지
2017 .12
-
뉴노멀 시대 무용교육자의 핵심역량 탐색
대한무용학회논문집
2021 .11
-
체육교사의 교수역량 형성과정에 관한 자문화기술지
한국스포츠교육학회지
2022 .07
-
UX디자인에서 시간축 기반의 사용자 조사 방법론에 관한 연구
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .10
-
헤어미용 전공 학생들의 미래핵심역량이 에듀테크인식 및 온라인 학습전이에 미치는 영향- 2년제 대학을 중심으로 -
한국인체미용예술학회지
2021 .09
-
현장 직무중심 디자인 역량별 요구도 분석
Archives of Design Research
2018 .02
-
거주자 UX(User Experience) 분석을 통한 스마트홈 단말기의 UXD(User Experience Design) 연구
한국공간디자인학회 논문집
2019 .01
-
산업제품디자이너의 실무역량 연구
기초조형학연구
2024 .08
-
핵심역량 함양 교육을 위한 미술교과역량과 기준 탐색
미술교육논총
2022 .06
-
대학축구선수의 생활역량 분석
한국융합과학회지
2021 .01
-
발달장애인 대상 실시간 원격 신체활동 프로그램 지도자의 교수학습 역량 탐색
한국특수체육학회지
2024 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-658-001938387