메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김기만 (중소벤처기업연구원) 오채운 (녹색기술센터) 이효은 (서울대학교)
저널정보
한국기후변화학회 한국기후변화학회지 Journal of Climate Change Research Vol.12 No.4
발행연도
2021.8
수록면
333 - 362 (30page)
DOI
10.15531/ksccr.2021.12.4.333

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted in 2015, by the United Nations (UN). In achieving the SDGs, science·technology·innovation (STI) has been emphasized as one of means of implementation in achieving SDGs. Hence, in order to reflect an STI perspective, the UN established the Technology Facilitation Mechanism (TFM) in September 2015. One of the main activities of the TFM is to formulate the guideline of ‘STI for SDGs Roadmaps’ and to encourage countries to create such individual national roadmaps. Along this line of work, recent discussion has centered around the development of indicators to measure activities and performance of STI for SDGs. This engendered a series of questions regarding i) what the proper STI indicators are for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of SDGs, ii) whether and what kinds of STI indicators are needed, iii) and how STI indicators are to be reflected at the global and national levels. Based on these, this paper attempts to explore whether and what kinds of STI indicators are reflected in the current indicators of the UN-SDGs and Korean SDGs (K-SDGs). For this analysis, this paper reviews the existing STI indicators in use, takes a national innovation system (NIS) perspective as a theoretical basis, and formulates four STI criteria and related specific STI indicators: i) R&D input and output, ii) STI institution/governance, iii) STI network, and iv) STI infrastructure. With four categories and their respective indicators, this paper examines how the indicators of the UN-SDGs and K-SDGs are relevant to the STI indicators and draws policy implications for each criterion. The analytical result reveals that the indicators of the UN-SDGs and K-SDGs include the STI indicators of all four criteria, though the patterns of reflection are different. This paper ends with some ideas for future policy and research approaches to the STI indicators for SDGs.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 배경
3. 선행연구 및 분석틀
4. 분석
5. 결론
Reference

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0